Mabela v S (Appeal) (A15/2024) [2025] ZALMPPHC 141 (29 July 2025)
Court
Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Case number
A15/2024
Judges
Kganyago, Diamond
The court found that the appellant had inflicted grievous bodily harm on the complainant during the commission of rape, triggering the minimum sentence of life imprisonment under the Criminal Law Amendment Act. The appellant failed to demonstrate substantial and compelling circumstances warranting deviation from the prescribed sentence. His lack of remorse, refusal to accept responsibility, and the aggravating factors—including breach of trust, brutality, and the prevalence of such offences—outweighed any mitigating factors. The appellant’s personal circumstances, including his youth and stat…
Stunga v S (Appeal) (CA&R155/2024) [2025] ZAECMKHC 54 (15 July 2025)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Makhanda
Case number
CA & R 155/2024
Judges
Cengani-Mbakaza, G H Bloem
The High Court dismissed an appeal against a life sentence for rape of an 11-year-old, finding no substantial and compelling circumstances to depart from the minimum sentence.
S v N.M (Sentence) (CC03/2025) [2025] ZAECMHC 59 (20 June 2025)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Mthatha
Case number
CC03/2025
Judge
Ngoqo
Sentencing judgment for murder and housebreaking. The court found substantial and compelling circumstances and imposed 8 years plus two 15-year terms, with concurrency.
Kock v S (KS 18/2024) [2025] ZANCHC 55 (13 June 2025)
Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Case number
KS 18/2024
Judge
Stanton
The High Court granted condonation and leave to appeal against life sentences for murder and related assault charges, finding reasonable prospects of success.
Kamati v S (A132/2024) [2025] ZAFSHC 171 (12 June 2025)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
A132/2024
Judges
Loubser, Opperman
The court found that the murder was committed in a particularly cruel and premeditated manner by the appellant and his co-accused. The appellant's personal circumstances, including his age, status as a first offender, parental responsibilities, employment, and cooperation with authorities, did not constitute substantial and compelling circumstances justifying deviation from the prescribed minimum sentence. The aggravating features of the offence far outweighed any mitigating factors. The sentencing court's decision to impose life imprisonment was correct and cannot be faulted.