Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Land And Property [2024] ZANWHC 141

Ntadile Miniral Resources (Pty) Ltd v Samancor Chrome Limited and Others (2874/2024)

Ntadile Miniral Resources (Pty) Ltd v Samancor Chrome Limited and Others (2874/2024) [2024] ZANWHC 141 (19 June 2024)

The High Court discharged an urgent rule nisi stopping chrome mining, finding no prima facie right, no irreparable harm, and that the balance favored Samancor.

  • Mineral And Petroleum Resources Development Act
  • Interim Interdict
  • Compensation Dispute
  • Surface Rights
  • Contractual Obligations
  • Interim-interdict
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2023] ZANCHC 89

Assmang (Pty) Ltd v Ochre Shimmer Trade and Invest 78 (Pty) Ltd and Others (Leave to Appeal) (1252/2023)

Assmang (Pty) Ltd v Ochre Shimmer Trade and Invest 78 (Pty) Ltd and Others (Leave to Appeal) (1252/2023) [2023] ZANCHC 89 (1 December 2023)

The court found that the first respondent failed to demonstrate reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The grounds of appeal largely repeated arguments already addressed in the main application and written reasons. The evidence did not support the first respondent's claim to lawful possession or consent to access Doornfontein, nor did the minutes or subsequent correspondence establish such consent. The Constitutional Court's decision in Maledu requires exhaustion of the section 54 process before mining rights may be exercised, and the facts did not show that this process was completed. Th…

  • Spoliation Order
  • Mineral And Petroleum Resources Development Act
  • Leave To Appeal
  • Costs Of Two Counsel
  • Surface Rights
  • Urgent Application
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2020] ZANCHC 6

Sydney on Vaal Property Association v Theta Mining Proprietary Limited and Others (363/2019)

Sydney on Vaal Property Association v Theta Mining Proprietary Limited and Others (363/2019) [2020] ZANCHC 6 (28 February 2020)

The applicant failed to prove peaceful and undisturbed possession or unlawful deprivation necessary for a spoliation order. The relief sought under Part A is dismissed. The applicant's reliance on the Maledu judgment and section 54 of the MPRDA to prohibit mining activities pending compensation determination is misplaced. Section 54 provides a mechanism for resolving compensation disputes but does not prohibit mining operations solely due to unresolved compensation. The standing court order grants the respondents access to the property, and the applicant must pursue compensation through arbit…

  • Mineral And Petroleum Resources Development Act
  • Spoliation
  • Surface Rights
  • Compensation For Land Use
  • Interdictory Relief
  • Internal Remedies
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2019] ZANCHC 47

Sedibeng Iron Ore (Pty) Ltd and Another v Rexton Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others (2772/2017)

Sedibeng Iron Ore (Pty) Ltd and Another v Rexton Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others (2772/2017) [2019] ZANCHC 47 (27 May 2019)

The High Court confirmed a rule nisi interdicting respondents from removing manganese ore from Klipfontein Farm, finding Sedibeng’s rights would be interfered with.

  • Mining Rights
  • Final Interdict
  • Waste Management Licence
  • Surface Rights
  • Environmental Compliance
  • Authority To Institute Proceedings
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.