Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] ZALMPPHC 157

Thabazimbi Local Municipality and Others v ABSA Bank Limited Others (11869/2023)

Thabazimbi Local Municipality and Others v ABSA Bank Limited Others (11869/2023) [2024] ZALMPPHC 157 (9 April 2024)

The High Court held that a section 17(2)(f) reconsideration application does not automatically suspend the challenged order and dismissed the urgent application with costs.

  • Superior Courts Act Section 17 2 F
  • Suspension Of Orders
  • Reconsideration Application
  • Interim Relief
  • Abuse Of Process
  • Superior-courts-act
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2014] ZACC 3

Estate Agency Affairs Board v Auction Alliance (Pty) Ltd and Others (CCT 94/13)

Estate Agency Affairs Board v Auction Alliance (Pty) Ltd and Others (CCT 94/13) [2014] ZACC 3; 2014 (3) SA 106 (CC); 2014 (4) BCLR 373 (CC) (27 February 2014)

Both section 32A of the Estate Agency Affairs Act and section 45B of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act are constitutionally invalid because they authorise warrantless searches without sufficient safeguards, failing to differentiate between types of searches or premises and lacking requirements for suspicion or judicial oversight. The right to privacy under section 14 of the Constitution is unjustifiably limited by these provisions. The declarations of invalidity are not retrospective, protecting past actions taken in good faith under the statutes. The invalidity is suspended for 24 months…

  • Right To Privacy
  • Warrantless Searches
  • Retrospective Invalidity
  • Suspension Of Orders
  • Reading In Remedy
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [1998] ZACC 3

Bruce and Another v Fleecytex Johannesburg CC and Others (CCT1/98)

Bruce and Another v Fleecytex Johannesburg CC and Others (CCT1/98) [1998] ZACC 3; 1998 (2) SA 1143; 1998 (4) BCLR 415 (24 March 1998)

The Constitutional Court held that the applicants failed to establish exceptional circumstances justifying direct access. The constitutional issue regarding section 150(3) of the Insolvency Act was not raised before the High Court, which had jurisdiction to consider such matters and grant interim relief. The applicants did not exhaust available remedies and launched the application on the incorrect assumption that only the Constitutional Court could grant relief. The urgency and public importance claimed were not substantiated, and the relief sought could have been pursued through ordinary pr…

  • Direct Access
  • Constitutional Invalidity
  • Right Of Access To Court
  • Liquidation Procedure
  • Suspension Of Orders
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.