Brits v Road Accident Fund (54415/2018) [2025] ZAGPPHC 417 (11 April 2025)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
54415/2018
Judge
Strijdom
Unopposed RAF claim arising from a motorcycle collision. The High Court awarded damages for medical expenses and loss of earnings, and ordered an undertaking for future medical costs.
Cornelius v Road Accident Fund (68974/13) [2018] ZAGPPHC 454 (16 February 2018)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
68974/13
Judge
Mphahlele
High Court damages judgment in a Road Accident Fund claim, finding the plaintiff’s post-accident work was sympathetic employment and awarding loss of earnings.
Sayed NO v Road Accident Fund (49442/2013) [2016] ZAGPPHC 1112 (16 November 2016)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
49442/2013
Judge
R G Tolmay
High Court award on future loss of earnings after a motor accident, with the court applying a 50% contingency deduction for a sympathetically employed plaintiff.
Makuapane v Road Accident Fund (2012/12871) [2015] ZAGPJHC 70 (10 April 2015)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2012/12871
Judge
D S S Moshidi
The court awarded the plaintiff damages for a motor vehicle accident, accepting sympathetic employment and loss of earning capacity, and declared the contingency fee agreement invalid.
Human v RAF (24720/2013) [2014] ZAGPJHC 441 (17 March 2014)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
24720/2013
Judge
Weiner
The High Court fixed the plaintiff’s retirement age at 62½ for loss of earnings, accepting that she was sympathetically employed and had pre-existing cervical spondylosis.
Gouveia v Road Accident Fund (2010/19802) [2013] ZAGPJHC 293 (18 November 2013)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2010/19802
Judge
Weiner
The court found that the plaintiff is sympathetically employed and his continued salary does not reflect his true earning capacity. The plaintiff's neurocognitive and psychological impairments are permanent, rendering him unemployable in the open labour market. The fact that the family business replaced his role with two employees supports the conclusion that his earning capacity has been lost. The court distinguished the present case from Rudman, noting that the plaintiff does not receive income as of right, but rather as a result of family sympathy. The calculation of damages for loss of ea…