Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Labour Law [2023] ZALCJHB 333

H & H Specialized Services (Pty) Ltd v Bezuidenhout and Others (J318/21)

H & H Specialized Services (Pty) Ltd v Bezuidenhout and Others (J318/21) [2023] ZALCJHB 333 (22 November 2023)

The writ of execution was set aside because it was issued for an amount inclusive of VAT, based on an invoice, rather than for remuneration as ordered by the Consented Order. The Consented Order required payment of remuneration for the suspension period, which, in the context of an employment relationship, obliged the applicant to deduct employee's tax before payment. The respondent's refusal to provide tax information prevented the applicant from complying with the order. The writ was therefore not in conformity with the judgment and could not be enforced as issued. The applicant's obligatio…

  • Writ Of Execution
  • Remuneration
  • Tax Deduction
  • Employment Relationship
  • Stay Of Execution
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2021] ZALCCT 14

Health and Welfare Sector Education and Training Authority v Mayosi and Another (C141/20)

Health and Welfare Sector Education and Training Authority v Mayosi and Another (C141/20) [2021] ZALCCT 14 (25 March 2021)

The Labour Court set aside a writ of execution after finding the employer lawfully deducted tax and the settlement amount had been paid for the employee’s benefit.

  • Settlement Agreement
  • Writ Of Execution
  • Tax Deduction
  • Payment Into Wrong Account
  • Settlement-agreement
  • Writ-of-execution
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2013] ZALCJHB 96

Naidoo v The Careways Group (Pty) Ltd and Another (J945/13)

Naidoo v The Careways Group (Pty) Ltd and Another (J945/13) [2013] ZALCJHB 96; [2014] 1 BLLR 69 (LC); (2014) 35 ILJ 181 (LC) (29 May 2013)

The court found that the applicant was unlawfully suspended and that the respondents failed to pay her salary for April 2013 without legal justification. The employer's obligation to deduct tax from salary arises ex lege and cannot be excluded by agreement. The respondents' claim of 'dirty hands' was not substantiated and did not justify withholding salary. The applicant is entitled to payment of her monthly salary less lawful deductions, including tax, pending the outcome of arbitration. Suspension without pay is unlawful unless contractually agreed. The matter was urgent due to the applican…

  • Salary Non Payment
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Tax Deduction
  • Basic Conditions Of Employment Act
  • Unlawful Suspension
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.