Molefe v Eskom Pension and Provident Fund and Others (93895/2019)
Molefe v Eskom Pension and Provident Fund and Others (93895/2019) [2025] ZAGPPHC 721 (11 July 2025)
The Full Court found that the court a quo erred in resolving the dispute regarding the amount repayable by Mr Molefe to the Fund solely on the papers, without proper consideration of the divergent expert actuarial evidence and the factual disputes regarding the calculation and flow of money. The court held that the matter required referral to oral evidence before a different judge to properly determine the quantum, as the actuaries' reports and supplementary affidavits revealed substantial disputes not amenable to resolution on affidavit. The court rejected the argument that the dispute had a…
Source excerpt
- Referral To Oral Evidence
- Expert Evidence
- Pension Fund Dispute
- Tax Refund Liability
- Costs Award
- Rule 41a Mediation