Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2024] ZAGPPHC 1168

Mantladi Technologies (Pty) Ltd v National Treasury and Others (033768/2022)

Mantladi Technologies (Pty) Ltd v National Treasury and Others (033768/2022) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1168 (11 November 2024)

Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
033768/2022
Judge
Mahosi

The applicant failed to establish that the National Treasury's decision was irrational or based on irrelevant considerations. Mantladi was non-compliant with the tender specifications, submitting woven items instead of non-woven ones and failing to provide required samples. The products of the successful bidders were confirmed to meet the tender requirements. The applicant did not demonstrate exceptional circumstances warranting substitution or compensation under PAJA. The late amendment to the notice of motion was not justified, as no case was made for the new relief. Accordingly, the applic…

Source excerpt

  • Public Procurement
  • Judicial Review Under Paja
  • Tender Award Challenge
  • Exceptional Circumstances For Substitution
  • Costs Award
  • Amendment Of Notice Of Motion
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2008] ZAECHC 29

Manong Associates (Pty) Ltd v Eastern Cape Department of Road and Transport and Others (2/2008)

Manong Associates (Pty) Ltd v Eastern Cape Department of Road and Transport and Others (2/2008) [2008] ZAECHC 29; 2008 (6) SA 434 (EqC) (24 April 2008)

Court
High Courts - Eastern Cape
Case number
2/2008
Judge
J.C. Froneman

The High Court, when sitting as an equality court, retains its constitutional and inherent review jurisdiction and is not a separate tribunal. The procurement policy challenged by the applicant was found to be rationally connected to legitimate objectives, namely ensuring safety, durability, and effective use of public funds in road construction. The requirements for experience and technical expertise did not amount to indirect unfair discrimination, as previously disadvantaged groups had opportunities to gain such experience, and the applicant itself generally met the profile. Allegations of…

Source excerpt

  • Public Procurement
  • Indirect Discrimination
  • Judicial Review
  • Equality Act
  • Constitutional Jurisdiction
  • Tender Award Challenge
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.