R and Others (45675/2014), R v
R and Others (45675/2014), R v [2015] ZAGPPHC 1138 (24 August 2015)
The court found that the applicant is the registered owner of the property and that the 1st respondent's right of occupation, derived from the divorce settlement agreement, was lawfully terminated after he failed to comply with its terms, including vacating the property and meeting financial obligations. The 1st respondent's continued occupation was deemed unlawful under the PIE Act. His offer to purchase the property was not a valid defence, as he failed to secure bond finance, did not make a market-related offer, and the applicant was under no obligation to sell to him. The court held that…
Source excerpt
- Prevention Of Illegal Eviction Act
- Eviction Of Unlawful Occupier
- Divorce Settlement Enforcement
- Just And Equitable Eviction
- Condonation Application
- Termination Of Occupational Rights