Fourie N.O v Van Der Walt and Another (A3073/2020; 3108/2020) [2023] ZAGPJHC 157 (23 February 2023)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
A3073/2020
Judges
G Malindi, L du Bruyn
The High Court held that a 20% bare dominium bequest did not entitle the son to remain on the property after the will’s three-month occupation period expired.
Samsodien v Samsodien and Others (9938/2020) [2020] ZAWCHC 151; 2021 (2) SA 601 (WCC) (29 October 2020)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
9938/2020
Judge
Davis
The court held that section 2(1) of the Immovable Property (Removal or Modification of Restrictions) Act 94 of 1965 does not empower it to remove or modify a lifetime usufruct granted in a will. A usufruct is a personal, limited but real right that forms part of the panoply of ownership rights, and is not a 'restriction' as contemplated by the Act. While the Act may justify modification of restrictions such as those on subdivision, it cannot be used to remove or restrict a usufructuary right expressly granted in the will. The equities favour the applicant, but the law is clear and does not pe…
Feldman v Oshry NO and Another (6752/20007) [2009] ZAKZDHC 8; 2009 (6) SA 454 (KZD) (14 April 2009)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
Case number
6752/2006
Judge
Van ZĂżl
The court awarded a surviving spouse monthly maintenance from the estate, rejected a lump-sum maintenance claim, and granted payment of a promised R50,000 donation.