Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family And Children [2025] ZAGPJHC 543

M.A.D. v R.G. (2025/047056)

M.A.D. v R.G. (2025/047056) [2025] ZAGPJHC 543 (27 May 2025)

An urgent Rule 43(6) application partly succeeded: the High Court ordered immediate therapy for a minor child and referred the matter to the Family Advocate.

  • Rule 43 Variation
  • Best Interests Of Child
  • Therapeutic Intervention
  • Shared Residency
  • Family Advocate Investigation
  • Rule-43
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2025] ZAECQBHC 4

M.D v L.N and Another (Reasons) (3051/2020)

M.D v L.N and Another (Reasons) (3051/2020) [2025] ZAECQBHC 4 (3 February 2025)

High Court child-care matter on parental alienation: rule nisi confirmed, primary residence moved to the applicant, with therapeutic and managed contact orders.

  • Parental Alienation
  • Best Interests Of Child
  • Care And Contact
  • Children S Act
  • Parenting Coordinator
  • Therapeutic Intervention
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2024] ZAGPJHC 922

P.K v L.K (2021/1368)

P.K v L.K (2021/1368) [2024] ZAGPJHC 922; [2025] 1 All SA 226 (GJ) (4 September 2024)

The court rejected urgent reinstatement of a 3-2-2 contact regime, appointed a new parenting coordinator, and ordered further child assessment and therapy.

  • Parenting Coordination
  • Child Contact Arrangements
  • Best Interests Of Child
  • Therapeutic Intervention
  • Parenting Styles Alignment
  • Parenting-coordination
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2021] ZAGPPHC 269

P.A.K v C.M.A.S.M (47512/18)

P.A.K v C.M.A.S.M (47512/18) [2021] ZAGPPHC 269 (23 April 2021)

The High Court allowed the respondent to relocate with three minor children to Maasstroom, awarded her primary care and residence, and set detailed contact arrangements.

  • Children S Act
  • Primary Residence
  • Relocation Of Minor Children
  • Parental Rights And Responsibilities
  • Contact Regime
  • Therapeutic Intervention
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2020] ZAECGHC 94

O.L.J v O.L.A (1370/2018)

O.L.J v O.L.A (1370/2018) [2020] ZAECGHC 94 (3 August 2020)

The High Court dismissed a Rule 43(6) application, found the applicant in contempt for withholding two minor children, and ordered their immediate return.

  • Primary Care And Contact
  • Contempt Of Court
  • Best Interests Of Child
  • Rule 43 Applications
  • Therapeutic Intervention
  • Costs Orders
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.