South Africa Case Law

Fezi Consultants and Auditors (Pty) Ltd v Centlec (SOC) Ltd (1381/2022)

Fezi Consultants and Auditors (Pty) Ltd v Centlec (SOC) Ltd (1381/2022) [2023] ZAFSHC 325 (15 August 2023)

Court

Free State High Court, Bloemfontein

Case number

1381/2022

Judges

Mbhele, Daniso

The court found that Fezi misunderstood the requirements of the tender, resulting in non-responsive pricing and failure to meet the prescribed minimum qualifying criteria. The tender documents were clear, and Fezi's bid did not comply with the technical specifications or the pricing schedule. The bid evaluation committee was not permitted to deviate from the conditions of the tender or condone non-compliance. The principles of fairness, equity, transparency, competitiveness, and cost-effectiveness, as set out in section 217(1) of the Constitution and the Preferential Procurement Policy Framew…

Source excerpt

• Public Procurement
• Promotion Of Administrative Justice Act
• Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act
• Acceptable Tender
• Bid Evaluation
• Threshold Requirement

Julies and Others v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others (9452/05)

Julies and Others v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others (9452/05) [2005] ZAWCHC 72; 2006 (4) SA 13 (C); [2006] 4 All SA 457 (C) (3 October 2005)

Court

Western Cape High Court, Cape Town

Case number

9452/05

Judge

P B Fourie

The court held that the Schedule 6A floor-crossing threshold is measured immediately before the window period begins, and dismissed the review.

• Floor Crossing
• Interpretation Of Constitution
• Threshold Requirement
• Party Membership
• Review Of Parliamentary Decisions
• Floor-crossing