Skiti v Skiti and Others (CA1/2023)
Skiti v Skiti and Others (CA1/2023) [2024] ZAECBHC 17 (9 July 2024)
The court held that the appellant failed to meet the requirements of section 47(1) of the Magistrates’ Court Act 32 of 1944, as he did not file a counterclaim or claim in reconvention in the Magistrates’ Court. His answering affidavit and application to stay the eviction proceedings contained only unsubstantiated allegations and speculation, without any formal counterapplication or sufficient factual basis to demonstrate a prima facie reasonable prospect of success in the intended High Court proceedings. The Magistrates’ Court therefore lacked the jurisdiction to stay the eviction proceedings…
Source excerpt
- Stay Of Proceedings
- Counterclaim Jurisdiction
- Eviction
- Administration Of Estates
- Magistrates Court Act
- Title Deed Dispute