Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Perumal v Songca and Others (D3715/2021) [2023] ZAKZDHC 42 (17 July 2023)
The High Court granted an eviction order under PIE, finding the applicant was the registered owner and the second respondent had no enforceable right to remain.
TACHMO CC v Mphuti N and Another (A39/2020) [2022] ZAFSHC 146 (31 May 2022)
The High Court upheld an appeal in a PIE eviction dispute, found the appellant proved ownership, and granted eviction with a six-month period to vacate.
Molatedi and Another v Lempe and Others (4236/2018) [2019] ZAFSHC 27 (14 March 2019)
The applicants proved ownership of the property through a registered title deed. The respondents failed to establish a valid defence to the eviction, as their alleged allocation and deed of sale from the municipality did not constitute legal title. The court found that all procedural requirements under the PIE Act were met, including proper notice and engagement with the municipality. The municipality offered alternative accommodation, and the eviction would not render the respondents homeless. The court exercised its discretion, finding it just and equitable to grant the eviction order, with…
Source excerpt
Dwele v Phalatse and Others (11112/15) [2017] ZAGPJHC 146 (7 June 2017)
The High Court granted an eviction order under PIE after finding the applicant proved ownership, the respondents were unlawful occupiers, and eviction was just and equitable.
Jhinabhai v Jhinabhai and Another (75807/2013) [2016] ZAGPPHC 1094 (3 November 2016)
The High Court granted an eviction order against a former spouse, finding the applicant was the sole owner and the respondent had no valid defence under PIE.
Explore more
