Seale and Others v Minister of Public Works and Others (899/2019)
Seale and Others v Minister of Public Works and Others (899/2019) [2020] ZASCA 130 (15 October 2020)
Clause K and the notarial contract did not create enforceable rights to registration of praedial servitudes, as they failed to identify a dominant tenement and amounted to an unenforceable agreement to agree, lacking a deadlock-breaking mechanism. The title deed provisions merely echoed the unenforceable clause K. The evidence did not establish acquisitive prescription, as there was insufficient proof of continuous use of the foreshore as if of right for 30 years prior to 1971. The second appellant, Ontspan Beleggings, is clothed with a registered praedial servitude of access to the Dam over…
Source excerpt
- Servitude Registration
- Acquisitive Prescription
- Agreement To Agree
- Deadlock Breaking Mechanism
- Praedial Servitude
- Title Deed Interpretation