Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial And Corporate [2023] ZANWHC 53

Oasis Water (Pty) Ltd and Another v Bester and Another (UM70/2023)

Oasis Water (Pty) Ltd and Another v Bester and Another (UM70/2023) [2023] ZANWHC 53 (16 May 2023)

The court found that the applicants were entitled to limited interim relief enforcing certain post-termination rights under the franchise agreements, specifically the return of manuals, signage, and removal of Oasis branding from the respondents' premises. However, the applicants failed to establish a protectable proprietary interest in the purification system, shop layout, or equipment, as these were not unique or confidential to Oasis Water and were not supplied by the franchisor. The court held that the restraint of trade and broader restrictive covenants sought by the applicants were not…

  • Franchise Agreements
  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Passing Off
  • Confidential Information
  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Trade Marks
Read case analysis
Intellectual Property [2021] ZASCA 11

Swatch AG (Swatch SA) v Apple Inc (1320/2018)

Swatch AG (Swatch SA) v Apple Inc (1320/2018) [2021] ZASCA 11; 2021 (3) SA 507 (SCA); 2021 BIP 9 (SCA); [2021] HIPR 158 (SCA) (29 January 2021)

The court found that, upon visual, aural, and conceptual comparison, IWATCH and SWATCH are sufficiently distinct. The common element 'WATCH' is descriptive and does not confer exclusivity. The prefixes 'I' and 'S' provide clear differentiation, and the marks do not sound alike. The likely consumers of the products are discerning and brand-conscious, further reducing the risk of confusion. The existence of Apple's i-prefixed family of trade marks was noted but not decisive. The appeal was dismissed as Swatch failed to establish that the marks are confusingly or deceptively similar under the Tr…

  • Trade Marks
  • Likelihood Of Confusion
  • Descriptive Use Exception
  • Visual Aural Conceptual Comparison
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.