Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Land And Property [2020] ZAWCHC 31

Hyde Construction CC v K2013046547 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd and Others (9179/2019)

Hyde Construction CC v K2013046547 (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd and Others (9179/2019) [2020] ZAWCHC 31 (29 April 2020)

The court held that Blue Cloud was a trader under the Insolvency Act, set aside the property sale and bond registration as against Hyde Construction, and ordered costs.

  • Insolvency Act Section 34
  • Voidable Dispositions
  • Trader Definition
  • Property Transfer
  • Creditor Protection
  • Motion Proceedings
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2013] ZASCA 110

Axal Properties 2 CC v Kotze (712/2012)

Axal Properties 2 CC v Kotze (712/2012) [2013] ZASCA 110 (16 September 2013)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that Mega Super Cement CC remained a 'trader' for the purposes of s 34(3) of the Insolvency Act at the time it disposed of its assets, as the cessation of trading activity does not terminate trader status until all debts are discharged. However, Kotze failed to prove that his claim arose 'in connection with' the business of Mega. The evidence established that his claim was for a brokerage fee relating to the sale of a member's interest, not a claim connected to Mega's primary business activities. The distinction between business and non-business liabilities ap…

  • Insolvency Act Section 34
  • Trader Definition
  • Creditor Protection
  • Close Corporation Liability
Read case analysis
Insolvency Law [2011] ZASCA 187

Gainsford NO and Others v Tiffski Property Investments (Pty) Ltd and Others (874/2010)

Gainsford NO and Others v Tiffski Property Investments (Pty) Ltd and Others (874/2010) [2011] ZASCA 187; [2011] 4 All SA 445 (SCA); 2012 (3) SA 35 (SCA) (30 September 2011)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the transfer of the business and assets of Tiffindell Ski Limited to Tiffski Property Investments was void under section 34(1) of the Insolvency Act because it was not in the ordinary course of business, was not for securing payment of a debt, and no notice was published as required. The company was a trader, and the transfer occurred within six months prior to liquidation. Consequently, Tiffski did not acquire ownership, and the mortgage bonds registered in favour of the State Bank of India Limited were also void. The Bank's constitutional property right…

  • Void Disposition Of Assets
  • Ordinary Course Of Business
  • Mortgage Bonds
  • Trader Definition
  • Constitutional Property Rights
  • Onus Of Proof
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.