Khoeta v Lehihi and Another (CIV APP12/2015)
Khoeta v Lehihi and Another (CIV APP12/2015) [2016] ZANWHC 28 (9 June 2016)
The appeal succeeded because the court a quo erred in deciding the matter on the papers despite material disputes of fact regarding the existence and terms of the alleged oral agreement for the sale of the house. The court a quo improperly made credibility findings in motion proceedings, contrary to the Plascon-Evans principle, and formulated contractual terms not agreed upon by the parties. The evidence regarding the higher offer and the nature of the payments was not sufficiently challenged or contradicted, and the matter could not be resolved without oral evidence. As the appellate court c…
Source excerpt
- Alienation Of Land Act
- Motion Proceedings
- Tribal Land Rights
- Disputes Of Fact
- Oral Agreement
- Condonation