Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Banking And Finance [2023] ZANCT 31

National Credit Regulator v Strydom and Another (NCT-274566-2023-137)

National Credit Regulator v Strydom and Another (NCT-274566-2023-137) [2023] ZANCT 31 (5 September 2023)

The Tribunal granted leave for the NCR to refer a debt-counselling fees complaint directly to it, finding a cognisable claim supported by documents.

  • National Credit Act
  • Debt Counselling Fees
  • Prohibited Conduct
  • Tribunal Jurisdiction
  • National-credit-act
  • Debt-counselling-fees
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2022] ZANCT 46

Mphasane v Afropulse 145 (Pty) Ltd Trading as Kingdom Doors (NCT/237419/2022/75(1)(b))

Mphasane v Afropulse 145 (Pty) Ltd Trading as Kingdom Doors (NCT/237419/2022/75(1)(b)) [2022] ZANCT 46 (29 September 2022)

The Tribunal found that the applicant's delay in filing the application for leave was approximately three months beyond the statutory period. While the delay itself was not substantial, the decisive factor was the statutory time-bar under section 116 of the Consumer Protection Act, which prohibits the Tribunal from entertaining complaints more than three years after the cause of action arose. The applicant's complaint originated in June 2016, and the application was only filed in July 2022, well outside the permissible period. The Tribunal is bound by the High Court's interpretation that it h…

  • Condonation
  • Late Filing
  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Prescription
  • Tribunal Jurisdiction
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2022] ZANCT 55

National Consumer Commission v ACS Pre Owned (Pty) Ltd (NCT/222616/2022/73(2)(b)

National Consumer Commission v ACS Pre Owned (Pty) Ltd (NCT/222616/2022/73(2)(b) [2022] ZANCT 55 (6 August 2022)

The Tribunal held that a second-hand Mercedes-Benz sold by the respondent was defective, ordered a refund of the purchase price, and directed collection of the vehicle.

  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Implied Warranty Of Quality
  • Prohibited Conduct
  • Refund Of Purchase Price
  • Second Hand Goods
  • Tribunal Jurisdiction
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2022] ZACONAF 4

Gcakasi v NTT Motors East London (Pty) Ltd (NCT-147567-2019-75(1)(b))

Gcakasi v NTT Motors East London (Pty) Ltd (NCT-147567-2019-75(1)(b)) [2022] ZACONAF 4 (6 June 2022)

The Tribunal dismissed a consumer’s claim for refund or replacement of a defective vehicle, finding he failed to prove CPA breaches and could not return the vehicle.

  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Defective Goods
  • Refund Claim
  • Tribunal Jurisdiction
  • Consumer-protection
  • Defective-goods
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2020] ZANCT 20

Carstens v Beukes and Others (NCT/133281/2019/75(1)(b))

Carstens v Beukes and Others (NCT/133281/2019/75(1)(b)) [2020] ZANCT 20 (24 September 2020)

The Tribunal refused leave to refer a consumer complaint about a defective vehicle, finding the alleged defects were raised too late and the refund claim was outside its jurisdiction.

  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Defective Goods
  • Refund Claim
  • Tribunal Jurisdiction
  • Consumer-protection-act
  • Defective-goods
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2019] ZANCT 95

Smooth Coast Trading and Projects (Pty) Ltd v Lidsay Saker VW East Rand (NCT/131624/2019/75(1)(b))

Smooth Coast Trading and Projects (Pty) Ltd v Lidsay Saker VW East Rand (NCT/131624/2019/75(1)(b)) [2019] ZANCT 95 (6 July 2019)

The Tribunal refused condonation for a late consumer application, finding the applicant lacked standing because the sales agreement had been cancelled and prospects of success were poor.

  • Condonation
  • Locus Standi
  • Tribunal Jurisdiction
  • Prospects Of Success
  • Locus-standi
  • Tribunal-jurisdiction
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2018] ZANCT 93

Mosana v Kempster Sedwick (Pty) Ltd t/a CMH Volvo Silver Lakes (NCT /95011/2017/75(1)(b))

Mosana v Kempster Sedwick (Pty) Ltd t/a CMH Volvo Silver Lakes (NCT /95011/2017/75(1)(b)) [2018] ZANCT 93 (27 June 2018)

The Tribunal dismissed a consumer’s direct referral after finding she had standing, but no reasonable prospects of proving defects or poor repairs under the CPA.

  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Leave To Refer
  • Locus Standi
  • Tribunal Jurisdiction
  • Prohibited Conduct
  • Damages Claims
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2012] ZANCT 13

BMW South Africa (Pty) Ltd v National Consumer Commission and Another (NCT/2679/2011/101(1)(P), NCT/2807/2011/101(1)(P), NCT/2806/2011/101(1)(P))

BMW South Africa (Pty) Ltd v National Consumer Commission and Another (NCT/2679/2011/101(1)(P), NCT/2807/2011/101(1)(P), NCT/2806/2011/101(1)(P)) [2012] ZANCT 13 (5 July 2012)

The Tribunal held it had jurisdiction to hear a consolidation application, consolidated the two Bonn matters, and left the Rogers matter to proceed separately.

  • Consolidation Of Matters
  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Tribunal Jurisdiction
  • Consolidation-of-matters
  • Joinder-of-parties
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2012] ZACT 4

MTO Forestry (Pty) Ltd and Others v Competition Commission and Others (10/AM/Feb11)

MTO Forestry (Pty) Ltd and Others v Competition Commission and Others (10/AM/Feb11) [2012] ZACT 4; [2012] 1 CPLR 201 (CT) (17 January 2012)

The Competition Tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to suspend merger conditions imposed by the Competition Commission in an intermediate merger approval.

  • Intermediate Merger Control
  • Suspension Of Merger Conditions
  • Tribunal Jurisdiction
  • Administrative Powers
  • Costs Award
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2010] ZACAC 2

Competition Commission v Pioneer Foods (Pty) Ltd (91/CAC/Feb10)

Competition Commission v Pioneer Foods (Pty) Ltd (91/CAC/Feb10) [2010] ZACAC 2; [2010] 2 CPLR 195 (CAC) (15 October 2010)

The Competition Appeal Court granted leave to withdraw an appeal and cross-appeal after settlement discussions, and held that Tribunal orders cannot be privately altered post-judgment.

  • Administrative Penalty
  • Withdrawal Of Appeal
  • Settlement Agreement
  • Tribunal Jurisdiction
  • Public Interest Representation
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.