Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAWCHC 326

Lourens N.O and Another v De Cerff N.O and Others (18727/2024)

Lourens N.O and Another v De Cerff N.O and Others (18727/2024) [2024] ZAWCHC 326 (22 October 2024)

The High Court provisionally sequestrated the ADC Family Trust, finding a liquidated claim, factual insolvency, and that sequestration would benefit creditors.

  • Provisional Sequestration
  • Liquidated Claim
  • Trust Insolvency
  • Creditor Advantage
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Provisional-sequestration
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2022] ZAGPPHC 528

Mattheus Hermanus Wessels Fourie N.O and Another v Elani Botha N.O and Another v Kombani Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others (23412/2021)

Mattheus Hermanus Wessels Fourie N.O and Another v Elani Botha N.O and Another v Kombani Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others (23412/2021) [2022] ZAGPPHC 528 (20 July 2022)

The High Court discharged a provisional sequestration order after a co-creditor tendered repayment of the applicant’s claim, finding special circumstances and no benefit to creditors.

  • Final Sequestration
  • Creditor Tender
  • Trust Insolvency
  • Judicial Discretion
  • Costs Order
  • Final-sequestration
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2016] ZAECGHC 19

Osborne v Cockin and Others; Osborne v Cockin N.O. and Others (5618/2015, 6053/2015)

Osborne v Cockin and Others; Osborne v Cockin N.O. and Others (5618/2015, 6053/2015) [2016] ZAECGHC 19 (12 April 2016)

The court found that the applicant had established a strong prima facie case for the confirmation of the Anton Piller order and interim interdict. Documentary evidence, including a facility agreement signed by Marioth Janet Cockin as a partner, contradicted her denial of involvement in Cockin Partners and undermined the credibility of both Marioth and Mark William Cockin. The court concluded that their false denials were attempts to distance themselves and the Cockin Trust from Shaun Cockin's fraudulent conduct. The evidence showed significant intermingling of business operations among the Co…

  • Anton Piller Order
  • Provisional Sequestration
  • Partnership Liability
  • Trust Insolvency
  • Fraudulent Misappropriation
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.