Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial And Corporate [2024] ZANCT 60

Culwick v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (NCT/316719/2024/75(1)(b))

Culwick v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (NCT/316719/2024/75(1)(b)) [2024] ZANCT 60 (13 November 2024)

The Tribunal found Vodacom misled the applicant about a R90 phone deal, contravened the CPA, ordered a refund of R11,622.08, and reinstated the original agreement.

  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Misleading Advertising
  • Unconscionable Conduct
  • Direct Marketing
  • Refund Claim
  • Contract Cancellation
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2023] ZANCT 44

National Consumer Commission v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (NCT/260497/2023/73(2)(b))

National Consumer Commission v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd (NCT/260497/2023/73(2)(b)) [2023] ZANCT 44 (13 October 2023)

The Tribunal found Vodacom breached the Consumer Protection Act on cancellation penalties, delayed cancellations, unconscionable conduct, and misleading marketing, and imposed a R1 million fine.

  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Fixed Term Contracts
  • Cancellation Penalties
  • Unconscionable Conduct
  • Marketing Misrepresentation
  • Administrative Fines
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2022] ZANCT 30

Gcakasi v NTT Motors East London (Pty) Ltd T/A NTT Volkswagen King Williams Town (NCT-147567-2019-75(1)(b))

Gcakasi v NTT Motors East London (Pty) Ltd T/A NTT Volkswagen King Williams Town (NCT-147567-2019-75(1)(b)) [2022] ZANCT 30 (6 June 2022)

The Tribunal dismissed a consumer’s claim for refund or compensation over alleged defects in a VW Polo GTI, finding no proven CPA breach and no basis for the relief sought.

  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Defective Goods
  • Refund Claim
  • Unconscionable Conduct
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Consumer-protection-act
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2017] ZAKZDHC 26

Four Wheel Drive Accessory Distribution CC v Rattan NO (6916/13)

Four Wheel Drive Accessory Distribution CC v Rattan NO (6916/13) [2017] ZAKZDHC 26; 2018 (3) SA 204 (KZD) (4 July 2017)

High Court dismissed a car hire company’s claim for repair costs, finding it lacked locus standi and that the unreadable agreement was unenforceable.

  • Consumer Protection Act
  • Locus Standi
  • Standard Form Contracts
  • Plain Language Requirement
  • Public Policy In Contracts
  • Unconscionable Conduct
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [1987] ZASCA 141

Virginia Land and Estate Company Ltd. and Another v Virginia Central City Properties (Pty)Ltd. (168/86)

Virginia Land and Estate Company Ltd. and Another v Virginia Central City Properties (Pty)Ltd. (168/86) [1987] ZASCA 141 (27 November 1987)

The court held there was no written variation of land sale agreements, the cancellation notice substantially complied, and the exceptio doli generalis did not apply.

  • Contract Variation
  • Forfeiture Clause
  • Exceptio Doli Generalis
  • Written Agreement Requirement
  • Extension Of Time
  • Unconscionable Conduct
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.