Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAST 2

Schmahl and Another v Special Investigating Unit (GP10/2020; LP10/2020)

Schmahl and Another v Special Investigating Unit (GP10/2020; LP10/2020) [2025] ZAST 2 (23 January 2025)

The Special Tribunal dismissed an application to join third parties in a damages matter, finding no proper basis for joinder and awarding costs against the applicants.

  • Joinder Of Parties
  • Apportionment Of Liability
  • Uniform Rule 13
  • Special Tribunal Rules
  • Joinder-of-parties
  • Special-tribunal
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPJHC 702

Amakhaza Moia (Pty) Ltd v Government Employees Pension Fund (2020/15023)

Amakhaza Moia (Pty) Ltd v Government Employees Pension Fund (2020/15023) [2024] ZAGPJHC 702 (22 July 2024)

The High Court held that a third party notice may be issued against a party already before court, and that an affidavit can serve as the notice under Rule 13.

  • Third Party Joinder
  • Uniform Rule 13
  • Irregular Step Application
  • Civil-procedure
  • Third-party-joinder
  • Uniform-rule-13
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZAGPJHC 619

E.M.V v C(...) (Pty) Ltd and Another (21010/2016)

E.M.V v C(...) (Pty) Ltd and Another (21010/2016) [2023] ZAGPJHC 619 (2 June 2023)

The court found that the defendant made out a case for joinder of Mr V as a third party after the close of pleadings. The Prescription Act does not bar the claim for contribution or indemnification at this stage, as the defendant does not have an independent claim for a debt against Mr V; the claim arises only if she is found liable to the plaintiff. The allegations in the third-party notice, if proven, would establish that all funds claimed from the defendant were withdrawn with Mr V's consent and for his benefit, thus disclosing a cause of action for contribution. The defendant provided a s…

  • Joinder Of Third Party
  • Uniform Rule 13
  • Prescription Act
  • Contribution And Indemnification
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2014] ZAFSHC 75

Smits v Member of the Executive Council: Police, Roads and Transport, FS (1657/2012)

Smits v Member of the Executive Council: Police, Roads and Transport, FS (1657/2012) [2014] ZAFSHC 75 (12 June 2014)

The High Court dismissed a default-judgment application seeking to declare a third party solely liable to the plaintiff under Uniform Rule 13.

  • Third Party Proceedings
  • Default Judgment
  • Apportionment Of Damages Act
  • Uniform Rule 13
  • Third-party-proceedings
  • Default-judgment
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.