W.J v K.W and Another (2018/29229) [2024] ZAGPJHC 834 (26 August 2024)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2018/29229
Judge
Liebenberg
The High Court found the first respondent in contempt of a Rule 43 order for enrolling children in a new school without the applicant parent’s prior agreement.
C.E v N.E (EL 1710 / 2022) [2024] ZAECELLC 36 (9 July 2024)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, East London Local Court
Case number
EL 1710 / 2022
Judge
A M Bodlani
The High Court varied a Rule 43 maintenance order, holding that the R15,000 payment was not for accommodation only but cash maintenance. It reduced the amount to R4,000 per month.
Visser v Visser (21127/2009) [2009] ZAWCHC 231 (15 December 2009)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
21127/2009
Judge
Breitenbach
The respondent failed to adduce sufficient evidence to establish a reasonable doubt that his non-compliance with the maintenance and costs contribution order was due to inability to pay rather than lack of will. The respondent's denials regarding ongoing income and private work were unsubstantiated, and his bank statements revealed withdrawals that could have been used to comply with the order. The respondent did not seek to file further evidence to rebut the applicant's claims about his income sources. The maintenance order remained unvaried, and the respondent's conduct was found to be wilf…