Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAMPMBHC 46

Tracexpress (Pty) Ltd v Xsun Transport (Pty) Ltd (5553/2023)

Tracexpress (Pty) Ltd v Xsun Transport (Pty) Ltd (5553/2023) [2024] ZAMPMBHC 46 (9 July 2024)

The High Court upheld exceptions to amended particulars of claim, finding the pleaded oral and written agreements vague, embarrassing, and insufficiently particularised.

  • Pleading Requirements
  • Vague And Embarrassing
  • Oral Contracts
  • Uniform Rules Of Court Rule 18
  • Civil-procedure
  • Pleading-requirements
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2020] ZANCHC 87

Quill Associates (Pty) Limited v Dawid Kruiper Local Municipality (209/2020)

Quill Associates (Pty) Limited v Dawid Kruiper Local Municipality (209/2020) [2020] ZANCHC 87 (20 November 2020)

The court dismissed a Rule 30 application challenging the signing of a plea and conditional counterclaim, finding no prejudice and no irregularity warranting relief.

  • Uniform Rules Of Court Rule 18
  • Uniform Rules Of Court Rule 30
  • Right Of Appearance In High Court
  • Pleading Signature Requirements
  • Civil-procedure
  • Uniform-rules-rule-18
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2018] ZAGPPHC 255

Midslabs (Pty) Ltd v PMT Construction (Pty) Ltd (2016/69574)

Midslabs (Pty) Ltd v PMT Construction (Pty) Ltd (2016/69574) [2018] ZAGPPHC 255 (24 April 2018)

The court held that there is no legal requirement that all material facts supporting a damages claim must be pleaded in the body of the pleading. It is permissible to attach a report to the pleading and refer to it in support of the claim for damages. Compliance with Rule 18(10) depends on whether, read together, the pleading and the attached report enable the opposite party to reasonably assess the quantum of the claim. Since the report was not before the court, no assessment could be made regarding its sufficiency, but the plaintiff's contention that all facts must be pleaded in the body of…

  • Pleading Requirements
  • Damages Quantification
  • Exception Procedure
  • Uniform Rules Of Court Rule 18
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2010] ZAECPEHC 11

Chemical Specialities (Pty) Ltd v Humansdorp Paint Centre CC (227/09)

Chemical Specialities (Pty) Ltd v Humansdorp Paint Centre CC (227/09) [2010] ZAECPEHC 11 (30 March 2010)

The High Court refused an amendment to particulars of claim, holding the proposed tacit-agreement claim was insufficiently pleaded and the revised claim would be inconsistent.

  • Pleading Amendment
  • Vague And Embarrassing
  • Tacit Agreement
  • Uniform Rules Of Court Rule 18
  • Pleading-amendment
  • Tacit-agreement
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2008] ZASCA 108

Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd. v Industrial Maintance Painting Services CC (448/07)

Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd. v Industrial Maintance Painting Services CC (448/07) [2008] ZASCA 108; [2009] 1 All SA 275 (SCA) (23 September 2008)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that an amendment to pleadings did not introduce a new prescribed debt; it concerned the same claim and was allowed.

  • Extinctive Prescription
  • Amendment Of Pleadings
  • Condictio Indebiti
  • Contractual Obligation
  • Uniform Rules Of Court Rule 28
  • Uniform Rules Of Court Rule 18
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.