Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Cronje and Others v Firstrand Bank Limited t/a First National Bank (3955/2019) [2025] ZAFSHC 86 (5 March 2025)
The High Court dismissed a Rule 21 application to compel further particulars, finding the requested information was mostly evidential and not strictly necessary for trial.
Radmore v De Wet and Another (56221/2021) [2024] ZAGPJHC 28 (17 January 2024)
The High Court dismissed an application to compel further particulars under Rule 21, finding the requested details were not strictly necessary for trial preparation.
Oraclemed Health (Pty) Ltd v Hollard Life Assurance Company Limited and Another (31338/2013) [2023] ZAGPJHC 469 (17 May 2023)
The court granted an application to compel further particulars for trial, holding the defendants’ replies under Rule 21 were inadequate and the request was necessary for fair preparation.
Sehlabaka v Road Accident Fund (4820/2008) [2010] ZAFSHC 130 (30 September 2010)
High Court costs ruling in a Rule 21 application: the respondent’s “will tender” letter was held not to be a clear tender, and costs were split accordingly.
Platinum Mile Investments 229 (Pty) Ltd v Visser (22760/02) [2005] ZAGPHC 34 (29 March 2005)
The court ordered a party to reply to a request for further particulars for trial under Rule 21 and held that necessity is for the court to decide.
Explore more
