Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
6 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2023] ZAGPJHC 314

Glen v Villa Medici Body Corporate (2023-031845)

Glen v Villa Medici Body Corporate (2023-031845) [2023] ZAGPJHC 314 (12 April 2023)

The High Court granted a spoliation order restoring access to an exclusive use area after the body corporate changed locks and removed the applicant’s belongings.

  • Mandament Van Spolie
  • Exclusive Use Area
  • Sectional Titles Act
  • Unlawful Deprivation
  • Possession
  • Self Help Remedy
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZAGPJHC 295

Dube and Another v Ninarich Investments (Pty) Ltd and Others (2023/00000054)

Dube and Another v Ninarich Investments (Pty) Ltd and Others (2023/00000054) [2023] ZAGPJHC 295 (27 March 2023)

The court dismissed a spoliation application, finding the applicants were never in peaceful and undisturbed possession and awarding attorney-and-client costs.

  • Mandament Van Spolie
  • Peaceful And Undisturbed Possession
  • Unlawful Deprivation
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Costs Punitive Order
  • Mandament-van-spolie
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2019] ZAECMHC 62

God Never Fails Revival Church v Mgandela and Another (2188/2019)

God Never Fails Revival Church v Mgandela and Another (2188/2019) [2019] ZAECMHC 62 (22 October 2019)

The High Court granted a spoliation order after finding the church was unlawfully deprived of possession of a church site used for worship.

  • Mandament Van Spolie
  • Possession
  • Unlawful Deprivation
  • Specific Performance
  • Rei Vindicatio
  • Mandament-van-spolie
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2019] ZAGPJHC 281

Lydall and Another v Roxton Wiggill and Another (2019/21429)

Lydall and Another v Roxton Wiggill and Another (2019/21429) [2019] ZAGPJHC 281 (7 August 2019)

The court found that the applicants were unlawfully deprived of joint possession of part of the property by the first respondent, who fenced off the area without their consent. The respondent failed to prove any legally enforceable agreement or consent by the applicants to the deprivation. The draft agreement relied upon by the respondent was never signed, and the mediator's correspondence confirmed that no firm agreement had been reached. The implementation of certain arrangements did not amount to acceptance of the entire proposal. In motion proceedings, affidavits serve as both pleadings a…

  • Mandament Van Spolie
  • Joint Possession
  • Unlawful Deprivation
  • Urgent Interim Relief
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2018] ZAECMHC 49

Tsegeya v Minister of Police and Another (2746/2018)

Tsegeya v Minister of Police and Another (2746/2018) [2018] ZAECMHC 49 (21 August 2018)

Urgent spoliation application over seized liquor stock failed after the court found the police search and seizure lawful under the Criminal Procedure Act.

  • Mandament Van Spolie
  • Search And Seizure
  • Unlawful Deprivation
  • Liquor Licensing
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Mandament-van-spolie
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2018] ZAECGHC 5

M.J.D v N.S and Another (5451/2017)

M.J.D v N.S and Another (5451/2017) [2018] ZAECGHC 5 (30 January 2018)

The High Court refused an urgent interdict and mandament van spolie, finding the applicant remained in possession but had not been unlawfully dispossessed.

  • Mandament Van Spolie
  • Interdict
  • Possession
  • Unlawful Deprivation
  • Mandament-van-spolie
  • Property-disputes
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2017] ZAKZPHC 55

Christian Faith Gospel Church in Africa v Dlamini and Others (11837/2016)

Christian Faith Gospel Church in Africa v Dlamini and Others (11837/2016) [2017] ZAKZPHC 55 (7 December 2017)

The court found the evidence of the applicant's witnesses to be consistent and probable, establishing that the first and second respondents joined the applicant and that the right to occupy and build on the property was obtained on behalf of the applicant. The congregation at Embo was a branch of the applicant, and after the resignation of the first and second respondents, the applicant remained entitled to use the building. The court further found that the keys to the building were surrendered under threat by the sixth and seventh respondents that the building would be destroyed if the keys…

  • Spoliation
  • Possessory Remedy
  • Unlawful Deprivation
  • Church Property Dispute
  • Interdict
  • Traditional Authorities
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2015] ZAGPPHC 161

Viljoen and Another v Bekker (9189/2015)

Viljoen and Another v Bekker (9189/2015) [2015] ZAGPPHC 161 (19 February 2015)

The court found that the applicants had a registered servitude in their favour and were in peaceful and undisturbed possession of the servitude road. The respondent unlawfully deprived the applicants of possession by constructing a trench that blocked access. The existence of an alternative route was deemed irrelevant to the exercise of possession of the servitude road and did not constitute a defence to unlawful deprivation. The applicants satisfied the requirements for a spoliation order, and the court ordered restoration of access and possession of the servitude road to the applicants.

  • Mandament Van Spolie
  • Servitude Right Of Way
  • Possession
  • Unlawful Deprivation
  • Status Quo Restoration
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2014] ZANWHC 42

Kokwe v Dr Ruth Segomotsi Mompati District Municipality and Others (1660/2013)

Kokwe v Dr Ruth Segomotsi Mompati District Municipality and Others (1660/2013) [2014] ZANWHC 42 (11 September 2014)

The court dismissed a spoliation application, holding that the applicant failed to prove quasi-possession of the right to use and occupy the vacant stand.

  • Mandament Van Spolie
  • Quasi Possession
  • Unlawful Deprivation
  • Possessory Remedy
  • Mandament-van-spolie
  • Quasi-possession
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2014] ZAGPPHC 478

Lobelo and Another v Kukama and Another (71429/2013)

Lobelo and Another v Kukama and Another (71429/2013) [2014] ZAGPPHC 478 (21 May 2014)

High Court spoliation application dismissed after finding no unlawful deprivation of possession, despite the applicants' prior access and control over the premises.

  • Mandament Van Spolie
  • Peaceful And Undisturbed Possession
  • Unlawful Deprivation
  • Director Delinquency
  • Eviction
  • Mandament-van-spolie
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.