Glen v Villa Medici Body Corporate (2023-031845) [2023] ZAGPJHC 314 (12 April 2023)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2023-031845
Judge
Moorcroft
The High Court granted a spoliation order restoring access to an exclusive use area after the body corporate changed locks and removed the applicant’s belongings.
Dube and Another v Ninarich Investments (Pty) Ltd and Others (2023/00000054) [2023] ZAGPJHC 295 (27 March 2023)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2023/00000054
Judge
Moorcroft
The court dismissed a spoliation application, finding the applicants were never in peaceful and undisturbed possession and awarding attorney-and-client costs.
Lydall and Another v Roxton Wiggill and Another (2019/21429) [2019] ZAGPJHC 281 (7 August 2019)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2019/21429
Judge
WHG Van der Linde
The court found that the applicants were unlawfully deprived of joint possession of part of the property by the first respondent, who fenced off the area without their consent. The respondent failed to prove any legally enforceable agreement or consent by the applicants to the deprivation. The draft agreement relied upon by the respondent was never signed, and the mediator's correspondence confirmed that no firm agreement had been reached. The implementation of certain arrangements did not amount to acceptance of the entire proposal. In motion proceedings, affidavits serve as both pleadings a…
Tsegeya v Minister of Police and Another (2746/2018) [2018] ZAECMHC 49 (21 August 2018)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Mthatha
Case number
2746/2018
Judge
Griffiths
Urgent spoliation application over seized liquor stock failed after the court found the police search and seizure lawful under the Criminal Procedure Act.
M.J.D v N.S and Another (5451/2017) [2018] ZAECGHC 5 (30 January 2018)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
Case number
5451/2017
Judge
T Malusi
The High Court refused an urgent interdict and mandament van spolie, finding the applicant remained in possession but had not been unlawfully dispossessed.
Christian Faith Gospel Church in Africa v Dlamini and Others (11837/2016) [2017] ZAKZPHC 55 (7 December 2017)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
Case number
11837/2016
Judge
Gorven
The court found the evidence of the applicant's witnesses to be consistent and probable, establishing that the first and second respondents joined the applicant and that the right to occupy and build on the property was obtained on behalf of the applicant. The congregation at Embo was a branch of the applicant, and after the resignation of the first and second respondents, the applicant remained entitled to use the building. The court further found that the keys to the building were surrendered under threat by the sixth and seventh respondents that the building would be destroyed if the keys…
Viljoen and Another v Bekker (9189/2015) [2015] ZAGPPHC 161 (19 February 2015)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
9189/2015
Judge
Molefe
The court found that the applicants had a registered servitude in their favour and were in peaceful and undisturbed possession of the servitude road. The respondent unlawfully deprived the applicants of possession by constructing a trench that blocked access. The existence of an alternative route was deemed irrelevant to the exercise of possession of the servitude road and did not constitute a defence to unlawful deprivation. The applicants satisfied the requirements for a spoliation order, and the court ordered restoration of access and possession of the servitude road to the applicants.
Kokwe v Dr Ruth Segomotsi Mompati District Municipality and Others (1660/2013) [2014] ZANWHC 42 (11 September 2014)
Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Case number
1660/2013
Judge
N. Gutta
The court dismissed a spoliation application, holding that the applicant failed to prove quasi-possession of the right to use and occupy the vacant stand.
Lobelo and Another v Kukama and Another (71429/2013) [2014] ZAGPPHC 478 (21 May 2014)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
71429/2013
Judge
Thobane
High Court spoliation application dismissed after finding no unlawful deprivation of possession, despite the applicants' prior access and control over the premises.