Amaning and Others v Ackerman (EQ3/2023)
Amaning and Others v Ackerman (EQ3/2023) [2024] ZAEQC 2 (10 May 2024)
The court found that the respondent, Mr Ackerman, used the k word in communications with Mr Wellman on three occasions. These communications, though not widely disseminated, were not within the intimate personal sphere and were sufficiently public to constitute 'communication' under section 10(1) of the Equality Act. The court rejected the respondent's argument that the communications were private and thus protected, holding that the context—a business relationship between two associates—did not attract the highest degree of privacy. The court relied on the purposive interpretation of section…
Source excerpt
- Hate Speech
- Unlawful Discrimination
- Harassment
- Promotion Of Equality And Prevention Of Unfair Discrimination Act
- Right To Dignity