Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPJHC 935

Eskom Holding SOC Limited Ltd v Sokweba and Others (101726/2024)

Eskom Holding SOC Limited Ltd v Sokweba and Others (101726/2024) [2024] ZAGPJHC 935 (18 September 2024)

The court found that Eskom had established a reasonable apprehension of future injury based on objective evidence linking the respondents, particularly Ms Sokweba, to the planned interruptions of its operations. The respondents failed to provide an undertaking or disassociate themselves from the protest actions, thereby justifying the inference that they would cause injury to Eskom. The court held that the requirements for an interdict were met, as the respondents were factually linked to the threatened unlawful conduct and Eskom's rights required protection. The belated argument on urgency w…

  • Interdict
  • Urgent Interdict
  • Unlawful Interference
  • Essential Service Protection
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2024] ZALMPPHC 115

Kgoete v Kgoete and Others (3597/2023)

Kgoete v Kgoete and Others (3597/2023) [2024] ZALMPPHC 115 (12 September 2024)

The High Court granted a final interdict protecting a recognised senior traditional leader from unauthorized meetings and decisions by royal family members.

  • Traditional Leadership
  • Final Interdict
  • Locus Standi
  • Unlawful Interference
  • Abuse Of Process
  • Traditional-leadership
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2022] ZALMPPHC 64

Baphalane Communal Property Association v Lebethe and Others (12657/2022)

Baphalane Communal Property Association v Lebethe and Others (12657/2022) [2022] ZALMPPHC 64 (29 November 2022)

The High Court granted a final interdict protecting leased farmland and access rights, dismissed the first respondent’s points in limine, and ordered costs.

  • Final Interdict
  • Lease Agreement
  • Unlawful Interference
  • Locus Standi
  • Motion Proceedings
  • Final-interdict
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2016] ZAGPJHC 277

Viviers NO and Another v City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality and Others (31753/2016)

Viviers NO and Another v City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality and Others (31753/2016) [2016] ZAGPJHC 277 (30 September 2016)

The High Court restrained the City of Johannesburg and a senior official from interfering with a statutory valuation appeal board’s duties and awarded punitive costs.

  • Municipal Property Rates Act
  • Statutory Board Autonomy
  • Interdictory Relief
  • Unlawful Interference
  • Interdict
  • Municipal-property-rates-act
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2014] ZAGPPHC 328

Great North Long Distance Taxi Association v Ngwenya and Another (4465/12)

Great North Long Distance Taxi Association v Ngwenya and Another (4465/12) [2014] ZAGPPHC 328 (30 May 2014)

The High Court granted a final interdict restraining two respondents from interfering with a taxi association’s operations and threatening staff or property.

  • Final Interdict
  • Unlawful Interference
  • Taxi Industry Violence
  • Condonation
  • Injury Apprehended
  • Final-interdict
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2009] ZAFSHC 37

Radebe and Others v Ficksburg Taxi Association and Others (7139/2008)

Radebe and Others v Ficksburg Taxi Association and Others (7139/2008) [2009] ZAFSHC 37 (19 March 2009)

The High Court ordered a taxi association to protect members’ route rights and restrained executive members from interfering with taxi ranks and operations.

  • Taxi Association Governance
  • Breach Of Constitution
  • Unlawful Interference
  • Operating Licence Rights
  • Taxi-association-governance
  • Operating-licence-rights
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.