Eskom Holding SOC Limited Ltd v Sokweba and Others (101726/2024)
Eskom Holding SOC Limited Ltd v Sokweba and Others (101726/2024) [2024] ZAGPJHC 935 (18 September 2024)
The court found that Eskom had established a reasonable apprehension of future injury based on objective evidence linking the respondents, particularly Ms Sokweba, to the planned interruptions of its operations. The respondents failed to provide an undertaking or disassociate themselves from the protest actions, thereby justifying the inference that they would cause injury to Eskom. The court held that the requirements for an interdict were met, as the respondents were factually linked to the threatened unlawful conduct and Eskom's rights required protection. The belated argument on urgency w…
Source excerpt
- Interdict
- Urgent Interdict
- Unlawful Interference
- Essential Service Protection