Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAKZPHC 42

Liberty Group Limited v Chonco and Another (7449/24P)

Liberty Group Limited v Chonco and Another (7449/24P) [2025] ZAKZPHC 42 (25 April 2025)

The High Court interdicted former Liberty affiliates from posting defamatory claims online, finding the allegations unproven and not fair comment.

  • Defamation
  • Final Interdict
  • Fair Comment
  • Truth And Public Benefit
  • Unlawful Publication
  • Freedom Of Expression
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2021] ZAWCHC 186

Media24 (Pty) Ltd v Nhleko and Another (4126/2019)

Media24 (Pty) Ltd v Nhleko and Another (4126/2019) [2021] ZAWCHC 186 (16 September 2021)

The High Court refused Media24 leave to amend its plea in a defamation action, finding the proposed amendments too vague and evasive, but allowed consequential adjustments.

  • Amendment Of Pleadings
  • Defamation
  • Precision In Pleadings
  • Unlawful Publication
  • Protected Comment
  • Amendment-of-pleadings
Read case analysis
Delict [2019] ZAGPJHC 450

Engelbrecht and Another v Independent Media (Pty) Ltd and Another (28924/2019)

Engelbrecht and Another v Independent Media (Pty) Ltd and Another (28924/2019) [2019] ZAGPJHC 450 (3 December 2019)

Default judgment in a defamation matter: the High Court declared two media articles false and unlawful, ordered removal from websites, and awarded R300,000 damages.

  • Defamation
  • General Damages
  • Interdictory Relief
  • Unlawful Publication
  • Default-judgment
  • Interdict
Read case analysis
Delict [2019] ZAGPJHC 506

Engelbrecht and Another v Independent Media (Pty) Ltd and Another (28924/2019)

Engelbrecht and Another v Independent Media (Pty) Ltd and Another (28924/2019) [2019] ZAGPJHC 506 (3 December 2019)

The court found that the statements published by the first defendant were defamatory, false, and unlawful. The publications accused the plaintiffs of corruption and fraud, damaging their reputation and dignity within the legal and insolvency professions. The defendants failed to retract or remove the statements despite requests, causing ongoing harm. The requirements for interdictory relief were met, and the plaintiffs had no alternative remedy. The court held that awarding damages to both plaintiffs would be unreasonable, as their reputations are intertwined. Accordingly, a single award of d…

  • Defamation
  • General Damages
  • Interdictory Relief
  • Unlawful Publication
Read case analysis
Delict [2009] ZAWCHC 234

Calderwood v City of Cape Town and Another (3756/03)

Calderwood v City of Cape Town and Another (3756/03) [2009] ZAWCHC 234 (30 April 2009)

The court upheld a defamation claim arising from newspaper reports, an internal email, and an affidavit linking a city employee to alleged permit irregularities.

  • Defamation
  • Vicarious Liability
  • Qualified Privilege
  • Unlawful Publication
  • Damages Assessment
  • Qualified-privilege
Read case analysis
Delict [2007] ZAGPHC 41

du Plessis v J T Publishing (EDMS) Beperk (751/2005)

du Plessis v J T Publishing (EDMS) Beperk (751/2005) [2007] ZAGPHC 41 (25 May 2007)

High Court defamation judgment awarding Juanita du Plessis R60,000 for a degrading magazine publication implying sexual misconduct.

  • Defamation
  • Quantum Of Damages
  • Sentimental Damages
  • Unlawful Publication
  • Damages
  • Delict
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.