Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2025] ZAWCHC 50

Reggio and Another v Regional Magistrate, Belville Specialised Commercial Crimes Court (Mrs Sonnenberg) and Others (18554/2023)

Reggio and Another v Regional Magistrate, Belville Specialised Commercial Crimes Court (Mrs Sonnenberg) and Others (18554/2023) [2025] ZAWCHC 50 (14 February 2025)

Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
18554/2023
Judges
Mthimunye, D Thulare

The High Court found that the Magistrate had, in substance, considered the factors listed in section 342A(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, even if not verbatim. The record demonstrated that the Magistrate enquired into the duration and reasons for the delay, the seriousness and complexity of the charges, and whether any party could be blamed for the delay. The State had provided all documents in its possession and was not relying on the information sought by the Applicants. The Magistrate's refusal to strike the matter from the roll and decision to postpone for trial did not amount to a gros…

Source excerpt

  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 342a
  • Unreasonable Delay In Trial
  • Review Of Magistrates Court Decisions
  • Right To Fair Trial
  • Pre Trial Conference
  • Disclosure Of Evidence
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2005] ZAWCHC 85

Acting Premier Western Cape v Regional Magistrate for the District of Bellville Division of the Western Cape, Le Grange NO and Others (8098/04)

Acting Premier Western Cape v Regional Magistrate for the District of Bellville Division of the Western Cape, Le Grange NO and Others (8098/04) [2005] ZAWCHC 85; 2006 (2) SA 79 (C); 2006 (1) SACR 351 (C) (15 November 2005)

Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
8098/04
Judge
R B Cleaver

The court held that the magistrate exceeded his statutory authority by ordering the Provincial Government to fund legal representation for the accused. The magistrate's court, being a creature of statute, has no inherent jurisdiction and cannot make orders against third parties not connected to the criminal trial. Section 342A of the Criminal Procedure Act does not empower a magistrate to overturn a prior refusal by the Provincial Government to fund legal representation, nor does it authorize orders imposing financial obligations on the Province. The proper entity for providing legal represen…

Source excerpt

  • Review Of Magistrate Order
  • Legal Aid Entitlement
  • Unreasonable Delay In Trial
  • Ultra Vires
  • Scope Of Section 342a
  • Provincial Government Liability
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.