Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2025] ZAGPJHC 374

Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd and Another v City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality and Others (2023/095869; 13361/2023; 120464/2023; 128616/2023)

Independent Institute of Education (Pty) Ltd and Another v City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality and Others (2023/095869; 13361/2023; 120464/2023; 128616/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 374 (8 April 2025)

The court found that the City of Johannesburg's public participation process in adopting the 2023/2024 Rates Policy and By-Law was perfunctory and failed to meet constitutional and statutory requirements. The City did not genuinely consider stakeholders' input, particularly regarding the impact on privately owned educational institutions. The categorisation of such properties under 'business and commercial' was irrational and unreasonably discriminatory, violating section 19(1)(c) of the MPRA and sections 28 and 29 of the Constitution. The City failed to consider the best interests of childre…

  • Municipal Property Rates Act
  • Public Participation
  • Irrationality
  • Unreasonable Discrimination
  • Right To Education
  • Best Interests Of Child
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2022] ZANCHC 47

Ekapa Minerals (Pty) Ltd and Another v Sol Plaatje Local Municipality and Others (680/21)

Ekapa Minerals (Pty) Ltd and Another v Sol Plaatje Local Municipality and Others (680/21) [2022] ZANCHC 47 (2 September 2022)

The court found that the Council of the Sol Plaatje Local Municipality imposed a property rates ratio of 1:22 for mining properties, which was significantly higher than the ratios for other non-residential categories, such as industrial and commercial properties. The municipality failed to provide any rational explanation for this differentiation. In the absence of justification, the differentiation was held to be unreasonable and in breach of section 19(c) of the Rates Act, which prohibits unreasonable discrimination between categories of non-residential properties. The applicants, as proper…

  • Municipal Property Rates Act
  • Doctrine Of Legality
  • Unreasonable Discrimination
  • Local Government Powers
  • Constitutional Invalidity
  • Retrospective Effect
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [1991] ZASCA 127

Sehume v City Council of Atteridgeville and Another (32/90)

Sehume v City Council of Atteridgeville and Another (32/90) [1991] ZASCA 127; 1992 (1) SA 41 (AD); [1992] 1 All SA 284 (A) (27 September 1991)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the City Council of Atteridgeville acted ultra vires by imposing a special levy under section 23(1)(p) of the Black Local Authorities Act to recover overcharges for municipal services previously collected under invalidated by-laws. The court found that the levy was, in substance, a retrospective increase in service charges, which the enabling statute did not authorise. The by-law circumvented the prescribed procedure for amending tariffs and discriminated unreasonably against ratepayers who had paid under the invalid by-laws, depriving them of refunds whi…

  • Municipal By Laws
  • Retrospective Legislation
  • Ultra Vires
  • Unreasonable Discrimination
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.