Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2018] ZAGPPHC 952

M.J.M v S (A165/2017)

M.J.M v S (A165/2017) [2018] ZAGPPHC 952 (6 July 2018)

High Court appeal in a rape conviction upheld the complainant’s competence, the use of an intermediary, and the sentence. The State’s sentence cross-appeal also failed.

  • Rape Of A Minor
  • Child Witness Competency
  • Use Of Intermediary
  • Minimum Sentences
  • Delayed Reporting
  • Hiv Status In Sexual Offences
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2018] ZAGPPHC 767

Malambu v S (A526/16)

Malambu v S (A526/16) [2018] ZAGPPHC 767 (5 February 2018)

The High Court dismissed an appeal against convictions for kidnapping, assault and rape, holding that intermediary-related irregularities caused no prejudice.

  • Rape
  • Kidnapping
  • Assault With Intent To Do Grievous Bodily Harm
  • Use Of Intermediary
  • Criminal Procedure Act
  • Sentencing Principles
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2015] ZAKZPHC 49

Z.F v S (AR 764/2014)

Z.F v S (AR 764/2014) [2015] ZAKZPHC 49; [2016] 1 All SA 296 (KZP) (22 October 2015)

The court found that the use of an intermediary for a witness over the age of 18 constituted an irregularity, but did not render the evidence inadmissible or result in a failure of justice, as the witness's answers were her own and there was no prejudice to the appellant. The admission of the J88 medical report without cross-examination of the doctor was a material irregularity, and the report was excluded from consideration. After evaluating the evidence, excluding the J88, the court held that the complainant's testimony was credible, corroborated, and sufficient to support the convictions o…

  • Sexual Offences
  • Rape
  • Indecent Assault
  • Criminal Procedure Act
  • Use Of Intermediary
  • Sentencing Guidelines
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2006] ZAECHC 22

S v Dayimani (CA&R75/06 , 55/2006)

S v Dayimani (CA&R75/06 , 55/2006) [2006] ZAECHC 22; 2006 (2) SACR 594 (E) (15 May 2006)

The trial was rendered unfair by three interrelated irregularities: (1) the complainant's evidence was given with the assistance of an intermediary without proper application or explanation to the unrepresented appellant, contrary to the requirements of s 170A of the Criminal Procedure Act; (2) the complainant was over 18 years old, making the use of an intermediary impermissible and her evidence inadmissible; (3) the magistrate failed to inform the appellant of the possibility of conviction on a competent verdict, further prejudicing his right to a fair trial. With the complainant's evidence…

  • Rape
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Use Of Intermediary
  • Competent Verdicts
  • Admissibility Of Evidence
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.