Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Land And Property [2016] ZAFSHC 205

Loggenberg NO and Others v Maree and Others (2801/2016)

Loggenberg NO and Others v Maree and Others (2801/2016) [2016] ZAFSHC 205 (23 December 2016)

The court held that the oral agreement relied upon by the applicants for the transfer of the Weltevreden farms was void for non-compliance with section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act, which requires such agreements to be in writing and signed by the parties. The particulars of claim did not disclose a cause of action, as the essential terms of the alleged agreement, including the purchase price and financing arrangements, were either undefined or incapable of determination. The court further found that South African law does not recognise an agreement to negotiate a further agreement unle…

  • Formalities In Respect Of Sale Of Land
  • Agreement To Agree
  • Pactum De Contrahendo
  • Vagueness In Contract
  • Exception Procedure
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2013] ZAWCHC 84

Osborne and Another v West Dunes Properties 167 (Edms) Bpk and Others (21985/12)

Osborne and Another v West Dunes Properties 167 (Edms) Bpk and Others (21985/12) [2013] ZAWCHC 84; 2013 (6) SA 105 (WCC) (6 June 2013)

The High Court upheld exceptions to particulars of claim, holding that the first plaintiff lacked standing and the sale agreement was void and unrectifiable.

  • Alienation Of Land Act
  • Rectification Of Contract
  • Locus Standi
  • Contractual Formalities
  • Vagueness In Contract
  • Enrichment Claim
Read case analysis
Land And Property [1985] ZASCA 119

Pro Nobis Landgoed (Edms) Bpk. v Amavuba (Pty) Ltd. (231/1984)

Pro Nobis Landgoed (Edms) Bpk. v Amavuba (Pty) Ltd. (231/1984) [1985] ZASCA 119 (19 November 1985)

The Appeal Division dismissed an ejectment appeal, holding the appellant failed to show the respondent was party to the alleged lease and that the alleged agreement was too vague.

  • Ejectment
  • Oral Lease Agreement
  • Vagueness In Contract
  • Right Of Retention
  • Oral-lease-agreement
  • Vagueness-in-contract
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.