Loggenberg and Others v Maree (286/17)
Loggenberg and Others v Maree (286/17) [2018] ZASCA 24 (23 March 2018)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the oral agreement between Mr Maree and Mr Loggenberg was not a contract of sale but rather a contract for the benefit of a third party (the Trust), whereby Maree undertook to purchase Weltevreden and transfer it to the Trust upon reimbursement of his costs and repayment of the loan. The agreement did not contemplate a sale to the Trust and thus did not require compliance with section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act. The pleadings, reasonably interpreted, disclosed a cause of action capable of enforcement. The court further found that the alleged vague…
Source excerpt
- Alienation Of Land Act
- Oral Agreements
- Exception Procedure
- Contract For Benefit Of Third Party
- Vagueness In Pleadings