Du Plessis v Majiedt N.O and Others (841/2023)
Du Plessis v Majiedt N.O and Others (841/2023) [2025] ZASCA 4; [2025] 2 All SA 16 (SCA); 2025 (4) SA 74 (SCA) (28 January 2025)
The appellant, having been provisionally sequestrated at the time of instituting the main application, was divested of his estate and lacked locus standi to litigate in his own name without the knowledge and consent of his provisional trustees. The discharge of the provisional sequestration order did not retrospectively restore his locus standi, as the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 does not contain such a provision. The lease agreement was void and unenforceable due to non-compliance with the mortgage bond's requirement for written consent from FNB, and the trustees did not elect to continue the…
Source excerpt
- Locus Standi Of Insolvent
- Validity Of Lease
- Sale Of Insolvent Property
- Interdictory Relief
- Trustee Powers Under Insolvency Act