Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Glover v Chelemu and Another (1352/2022) [2024] ZAGPJHC 43 (24 January 2024)
The High Court dismissed an application to register a servitude of right of way over an encroached portion of land, and also dismissed the counter-application.
Naidu and Another v Standard Bank of South Africa Limited (3201/2016) [2017] ZAKZDHC 48 (22 December 2017)
High Court dismissed an application to set aside a sale in execution, holding that the Rule 46 notice was sufficiently compliant and no invalidating prejudice was shown.
J N.O. v M N.O. (27314/13) [2014] ZAGPPHC 264 (12 February 2014)
The High Court authorised an executor to transfer jointly owned property to the auction purchaser despite the co-owner’s opposition, finding the sale fair and equitable.
Van Niekerk v Van Niekerk and Others (9093/07) [2011] ZAWCHC 233 (23 May 2011)
The court dismissed an application to partition jointly owned family properties, finding the proposed split arbitrary and inequitable given the usufruct and parties’ positions.
Paradyskloof Golf Estate (Pty) Ltd v Municipality of Stellenbosch (547/08) [2010] ZASCA 92; [2010] 4 All SA 591 (SCA) ; 2011 (2) SA 525 (SCA) (2 July 2010)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the Municipality validly resiled from a land sale agreement after a suspensive condition was not fulfilled, and dismissed the appeal.
Burnett v Deloitte & Touch and Another (4254/2008) [2010] ZAWCHC 84; 2010 (5) SA 259 (WCC) (20 April 2010)
The High Court held that prescription on a damages claim arising from an arbitral valuation began only when the award was set aside, so the special plea failed.
Chetty v Govender and Another, Govender and Another v Chetty and Another (9190/06, 9380/04) [2008] ZAKZHC 101 (20 June 2008)
The High Court refused an interdict against enforcement of a settlement agreement and upheld enforcement under Rule 41(4), rejecting fraud and valuation challenges.
Explore more
