Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Admiralty And Maritime [2019] ZASCA 104

Afgri Grain Marketing (Pty) Ltd v Trustees for the time being of Copenship Bulkers A/S (in liquidation) and Others (797/2018)

Afgri Grain Marketing (Pty) Ltd v Trustees for the time being of Copenship Bulkers A/S (in liquidation) and Others (797/2018) [2019] ZASCA 104 (23 August 2019)

Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
797/2018
Judges
Wallis, Van der Merwe, Mocumie, Schippers, Mokgohloa

The Supreme Court of Appeal amended a costs order to remove an erroneous reference to costs under s 18(3) of the Superior Courts Act.

  • Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act
  • Variation Of Costs Order
  • Superior Courts Act
  • Security Arrest
  • Leave To Appeal
  • Costs-order
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2006] ZAECHC 64

De Villiers v De Villiers (E1223/04)

De Villiers v De Villiers (E1223/04) [2006] ZAECHC 64 (16 November 2006)

Court
High Courts - Eastern Cape
Case number
E1223/04
Judge
Jones

The court held it was functus officio and could not vary a consent costs order; the remedy lay with the taxing master and, if needed, review.

  • Variation Of Costs Order
  • Functus Officio
  • Review Of Taxation
  • Party And Party Costs
  • Functus-officio
  • Costs-order-variation
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2003] ZANWHC 6

Natonal Director of public Prosecutions v Seoposengwe and Others (42/2002)

Natonal Director of public Prosecutions v Seoposengwe and Others (42/2002) [2003] ZANWHC 6 (20 February 2003)

Court
North West High Court, Mafikeng
Case number
42/2002
Judge
M.T.R. Mogoeng

The court corrected its earlier judgment to award costs to the eighth respondent, who had entirely succeeded, while refusing costs to the first to seventh respondents.

  • Variation Of Costs Order
  • Rule 42 Application
  • Restraint Order
  • Costs Award
  • Rule-42
  • Costs-order
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.