Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 77

Invicta Holdings Ltd v Dartcom SA (Pty) Ltd (LM099Oct21)

Invicta Holdings Ltd v Dartcom SA (Pty) Ltd (LM099Oct21) [2021] ZACT 77 (13 December 2021)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Invicta Holdings’ merger with Dartcom SA, finding no horizontal or vertical overlap and no public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger
  • Public Interest
  • Bbbee
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Relationship
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 71

KAP Industrial Holdings Limited v DriveRisk Holdings (Pty) Ltd (LM093Oct21)

KAP Industrial Holdings Limited v DriveRisk Holdings (Pty) Ltd (LM093Oct21) [2021] ZACT 71 (9 December 2021)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved KAP’s acquisition of DriveRisk Holdings, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger
  • Vertical Relationship
  • Customer Foreclosure
  • Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment
  • Public Interest
  • Unconditional Approval
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2018] ZACT 51

Dis-Chem Pharmarcies Ltd v Quenets Pharmaceutical Wholesalers (Pty) Ltd, Brandwacht Marketing (Pty) Ltd (LM115Jul18)

Dis-Chem Pharmarcies Ltd v Quenets Pharmaceutical Wholesalers (Pty) Ltd, Brandwacht Marketing (Pty) Ltd (LM115Jul18) [2018] ZACT 51 (15 November 2018)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Dis-Chem’s acquisition of Quenets and Brandwacht, finding low market shares and no substantial competition concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Relationship
  • Public Interest
  • Market Share Analysis
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2017] ZACT 15

Novus Holdings Limited v ITB Manufacturing (Pty) Ltd (LM025Apr17)

Novus Holdings Limited v ITB Manufacturing (Pty) Ltd (LM025Apr17) [2017] ZACT 15 (10 July 2017)

The Competition Tribunal approved Novus Holdings’ acquisition of ITB Manufacturing unconditionally after finding no substantial competition harm or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Relationship
  • Public Interest
  • Unconditional Approval
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2017] ZACT 25

Arcelor Mittal SA Ltd v Metal and Thabazimbi Mine (LM231Mar17)

Arcelor Mittal SA Ltd v Metal and Thabazimbi Mine (LM231Mar17) [2017] ZACT 25; [2017] 1 CPLR 209 (CT) (22 June 2017)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved ArcelorMittal South Africa’s acquisition of Thabazimbi Mine, finding no substantial lessening of competition or public interest harm.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Relationship
  • Substantial Lessening Of Competition
  • Public Interest
  • Rehabilitation Liability
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2017] ZACT 43

Hesteel International Holdings Co. Limited and Others v Smart Union Resources (Hong Kong) Co. Limited (LM233Mar17)

Hesteel International Holdings Co. Limited and Others v Smart Union Resources (Hong Kong) Co. Limited (LM233Mar17) [2017] ZACT 43; [2017] 1 CPLR 302 (CT) (25 May 2017)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Hesteel’s acquisition of Smart Union Resources, finding no likely substantial competition harm or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Relationship
  • Foreclosure Effects
  • Public Interest
  • Iron Ore Market
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2016] ZACT 65

Invenfin Proprietary Limited v Dynamic Commodities Proprietary Limited (LM044JUN16)

Invenfin Proprietary Limited v Dynamic Commodities Proprietary Limited (LM044JUN16) [2016] ZACT 65 (12 August 2016)

The Competition Tribunal approved Invenfin’s acquisition of a 30% stake in Dynamic Commodities, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Large Merger
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Relationship
  • Public Interest
  • Market Definition
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2016] ZACT 54

Housing Impact Fund South Africa Trust v Mettle Property Solutions Securitisation (RF) Proprietary Limited (LM025MAY16)

Housing Impact Fund South Africa Trust v Mettle Property Solutions Securitisation (RF) Proprietary Limited (LM025MAY16) [2016] ZACT 54 (20 July 2016)

The Competition Tribunal approved HIFSA’s acquisition of sole control of Mettle unconditionally, finding no competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Relationship
  • Public Interest
  • Market Structure
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2016] ZACT 41

PPC Limited v 3Q Mahuma Concrete Proprietary Limited (LM213Jan16)

PPC Limited v 3Q Mahuma Concrete Proprietary Limited (LM213Jan16) [2016] ZACT 41; [2016] 1 CPLR 232 (CT) (12 May 2016)

The Tribunal approved PPC Limited’s acquisition of 3Q Mahuma Concrete unconditionally, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Relationship
  • Public Interest
  • Merger-control
  • Horizontal-overlap
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2015] ZACT 105

Macquarie Africa (Pty) Ltd v Macquarie First South (Pty) Ltd (LM141Sep15)

Macquarie Africa (Pty) Ltd v Macquarie First South (Pty) Ltd (LM141Sep15) [2015] ZACT 105 (27 November 2015)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Macquarie Africa’s acquisition of sole control over Macquarie First South, finding no substantial competition or public interest concerns.

  • Merger Control
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Vertical Relationship
  • Public Interest
  • Market Share Analysis
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.