Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2024] ZACT 6

Competition Commission v Pistorius N.O. and Others (CR150Oct13/SA 155Dec23)

Competition Commission v Pistorius N.O. and Others (CR150Oct13/SA 155Dec23) [2024] ZACT 6 (13 February 2024)

The Competition Tribunal confirmed a settlement resolving allegations that H Pistorius & Co imposed minimum resale prices for agricultural lime, with payments and compliance undertakings ordered.

  • Resale Price Maintenance
  • Vertical Restrictions
  • Settlement Agreement
  • Section 5 2 Competition Act
  • Compliance Programme
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2018] ZACT 121

Shoprite Checkers Proprietary Limited and Other v Massmart Holdings Limited (CRP034Jun15/EXC241Mar17, CRP034Jun15/EXC240Mar17, CRP034Jun15/EXC239Mar17)

Shoprite Checkers Proprietary Limited and Other v Massmart Holdings Limited (CRP034Jun15/EXC241Mar17, CRP034Jun15/EXC240Mar17, CRP034Jun15/EXC239Mar17) [2018] ZACT 121; [2018] 1 CPLR 155 (CT) (13 February 2018)

The Competition Tribunal upheld exceptions to Massmart’s section 5(1) complaint referral, finding the pleading vague and insufficient on market definition and foreclosure.

  • Exclusive Dealing
  • Vertical Restrictions
  • Market Definition
  • Foreclosure
  • Consumer Welfare
  • Section 5 1 Competition Act
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2014] ZACT 101

Lekoa Fitment Centre v Competition Tribunal and Another (132/CAC/Dec14)

Lekoa Fitment Centre v Competition Tribunal and Another (132/CAC/Dec14) [2014] ZACT 101 (10 December 2014)

Lekoa Fitment Centre appealed an exception ruling, arguing its amended competition complaint disclosed a cause of action about exclusivity, restraint of trade, and unfair pricing.

  • Vertical Restrictions
  • Abuse Of Dominance
  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Exclusive Dealing
  • Unfair Pricing
  • Competition Act Section 5 1
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2013] ZACT 93

Chitando v Fitzgerald and Others, Chitando v Webber Wentzel and Others (016550, 016568)

Chitando v Fitzgerald and Others, Chitando v Webber Wentzel and Others (016550, 016568) [2013] ZACT 93; [2013] 2 CPLR 507 (CT) (19 September 2013)

The Tribunal dismissed interim relief claims alleging exclusion of an African advocate from shipping law briefs. It found no proven agreement, dominance, or irreparable harm.

  • Abuse Of Dominance
  • Vertical Restrictions
  • Horizontal Agreements
  • Briefing Patterns
  • Market Definition
  • Interim Relief
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2010] ZACT 21

Competition Commission v BMW South Africa (Pty) Ltd t/a BMW Motorrad (97/CR/Sep08)

Competition Commission v BMW South Africa (Pty) Ltd t/a BMW Motorrad (97/CR/Sep08) [2010] ZACT 21; [2010] 1 CPLR 64 (CT) (17 March 2010)

The Tribunal confirmed a settlement in a Competition Commission complaint against BMW Motorrad concerning alleged resale price maintenance and dealer discount restrictions.

  • Resale Price Maintenance
  • Vertical Restrictions
  • Abuse Of Dominance
  • Dealer Agreements
  • Resale-price-maintenance
  • Vertical-restrictions
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2003] ZACT 8

Astral Foods Limited and National Chick Limited (2) (69/AM/Dec01)

Astral Foods Limited and National Chick Limited (2) (69/AM/Dec01) [2003] ZACT 8 (20 February 2003)

The Competition Tribunal granted leave to intervene in a merger-order variation application, holding that affected parties may be heard and oppose the variation.

  • Merger Variation
  • Standing To Intervene
  • Vertical Restrictions
  • Contractual Obligations
  • Competition-law
  • Merger-control
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.