Minister of Police v Stevens (A2024/100331) [2025] ZAGPJHC 361 (4 April 2025)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
A2024/100331
Judges
Du Plessis, Meaden
The High Court dismissed an appeal over unlawful arrest and detention, holding that police failed to exercise the discretion required for a warrantless arrest.
M.E.S v Minister of Police and Another (4996/2019) [2024] ZALMPPHC 136 (5 September 2024)
Court
Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Case number
4996/2019
Judge
Naude-Odendaal
The court found that the police officers had reasonable grounds to arrest the plaintiff for the alleged rape of a minor child, based on the victim's statements, corroborating witness accounts, and medical evidence. The arrest was lawful under section 40(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Act. The officers also properly applied their minds to the necessity of detention, given the seriousness of the charge and the evidence available. The further detention of the plaintiff after DNA results did not render the detention unlawful, as the absence of DNA evidence did not exonerate the plaintiff and inv…
Minister of Police v Mvelo (CA&R 3/2023) [2024] ZANCHC 59 (21 June 2024)
Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Case number
CA&R 3/2023
Judges
Stanton, Tyuthuza
The court found that the appellant provided a reasonable explanation for the default in serving the discovery affidavit, which was due to a bona fide mistake in serving the wrong attorneys. The appellant acted promptly upon learning of the default judgment. The court held that the arresting officer had reasonable suspicion to effect the arrest based on credible information, and was not required to conduct further investigations before arresting the respondent. The magistrate erred in failing to apply the reasonable prospects of success test and in not considering the appellant's bona fide def…
Tlaka v Minister of Police (HCA20/2021) [2024] ZALMPPHC 15 (7 February 2024)
Court
Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Case number
HCA20/2021
Judges
Naude-Odendaal, M.F. Kganyago
The High Court dismissed an appeal against a finding that a warrantless arrest and brief detention were lawful under section 40(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Act.
Hlapi v Minister of Police (A3069/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 70 (1 February 2023)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
A3069/2022
Judges
Adams, Turner
The High Court dismissed an appeal against a finding that the arrest and detention for dagga possession were lawful and that police discretion was not improperly exercised.
Willie v Minister of Police and Others (A170/2019) [2020] ZAFSHC 122 (8 June 2020)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
A170/2019
Judges
S Naidoo, P Molitsoane
Appeal dismissed in a wrongful arrest claim. The High Court held the appellant was lawfully arrested for drinking in public and the officers had lawfully detained her.
Minister of Safety and Security v Pavier (37286/2013) [2017] ZAGPPHC 727 (15 November 2017)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
37286/2013
Judge
Nkosi
High Court granted leave to appeal and condonation, finding a reasonable prospect of a different outcome on arrest, evidence procedure, and assault issues.
Mtwalo v Minister of Safety and Security (8772/2009) [2014] ZAKZPHC 18 (27 March 2014)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
Case number
8772/2009
Judge
Nzimande
High Court judgment dismissing claims for unlawful search, arrest, detention and assault after finding the police acted lawfully and the assault claim unproven.
Qaku v Minister of Safety & Security (1112/08) [2013] ZAECMHC 23 (18 July 2013)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Mthatha
Case number
1112/08
Judge
Z.M. Nhlangulela
The court held that the police acted lawfully in conducting warrantless searches of the plaintiff's two houses and vehicle, as they reasonably believed that delay in obtaining a warrant would defeat the object of the search. The evidence established that the police attempted to obtain a warrant but were unable to do so, and acted on credible information regarding stolen property and unlicensed firearms. The plaintiff's consent was not voluntary, but consent was not the only jurisdictional factor; the requirements of section 22(b) of the Criminal Procedure Act were satisfied. The arrest and de…