Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2024] ZAWCHC 229

Lorenzi v S (A130/21)

Lorenzi v S (A130/21) [2024] ZAWCHC 229; 2025 (1) SACR 421 (WCC) (29 August 2024)

High Court appeal against refusal of bail pending reconsideration of leave to appeal was dismissed. The court held the appellant had not shown that bail was in the interests of justice.

  • Bail Pending Appeal
  • Minimum Sentences Act
  • Flight Risk
  • White Collar Crime
  • Section 17 2 F Superior Courts Act
  • Correctional Supervision
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2024] ZAGPPHC 746

S v Matodzi (Sentence) (CC34/2024)

S v Matodzi (Sentence) (CC34/2024) [2024] ZAGPPHC 746 (10 July 2024)

The High Court sentenced Tshifhiwa Calvin Matodzi to 15 years’ imprisonment in a VBS-related fraud matter, accepting a plea and sentence agreement and declining a firearm disqualification.

  • Fraud
  • White Collar Crime
  • Sentencing Agreement
  • Abuse Of Trust
  • Criminal-sentencing
  • White-collar-crime
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2023] ZAWCHC 320

Imran v S (A112/2023)

Imran v S (A112/2023) [2023] ZAWCHC 320 (7 November 2023)

The High Court dismissed an appeal against refusal of bail, finding the magistrate had not misdirected herself and that the interests of justice did not permit release.

  • Bail Application
  • Schedule 5 Offence
  • Interest Of Justice
  • Flight Risk
  • White Collar Crime
  • Bail-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2022] ZAGPJHC 661

S v Porrit and Another (SS 40/2006)

S v Porrit and Another (SS 40/2006) [2022] ZAGPJHC 661 (11 August 2022)

The court finds that both accused have made their intention clear to embark on protracted cross-examination of Ramsay, mirroring their previous conduct with other witnesses. The court is empowered under section 166(3)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act to impose reasonable limits on cross-examination to prevent undue delay. The accused's right to a fair trial is not absolute and must be balanced against the interests of justice and the efficient conduct of proceedings. The documentary evidence is central to the prosecution's case, and excessive questioning on credibility alone is not justified.…

  • Cross Examination Limitation
  • Trial Delay
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Criminal Procedure Act Section 166
  • White Collar Crime
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2021] ZAGPJHC 408

Molefe and Others v S (A02/2021)

Molefe and Others v S (A02/2021) [2021] ZAGPJHC 408 (3 September 2021)

The appeal court found no misdirection by the trial court in imposing an eight-year custodial sentence for six counts of theft involving substantial sums stolen from the Department of Justice and Correctional Services. The trial court had properly considered the appellant's personal circumstances, the recommendations of the probation and correctional supervision officers, and the gravity of the offence. The appellant showed no genuine remorse and failed to take accountability for his actions. Given the prevalence of white-collar crime and the need for deterrence and retribution, the sentence…

  • Theft
  • Sentencing Principles
  • White Collar Crime
  • Mitigation Of Sentence
  • Custodial Vs Non Custodial
  • Remorse
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2019] ZAGPJHC 446

Mogobatlou v S (A208/2017)

Mogobatlou v S (A208/2017) [2019] ZAGPJHC 446 (25 October 2019)

The High Court dismissed an appeal against conviction and 15-year sentence for theft of R5.26 million from ATMs, finding the appellant’s version improbable and the confession admissible.

  • Theft
  • Confession Admissibility
  • Sentencing Discretion
  • White Collar Crime
  • Confession-admissibility
  • Sentencing-discretion
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2019] ZASCA 113

Kwenda v S (682/2018)

Kwenda v S (682/2018) [2019] ZASCA 113 (17 September 2019)

The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against refusal of leave to appeal a criminal sentence for fraud, finding no reasonable prospects of success.

  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Fraud
  • Substantial And Compelling Circumstances
  • Leave To Appeal
  • White Collar Crime
  • Minimum-sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2017] ZAGPJHC 249

Nxele v S (A76/2017)

Nxele v S (A76/2017) [2017] ZAGPJHC 249 (12 September 2017)

The appeal court found that the sentence imposed by the trial court was disproportionate, particularly the 15-year sentence on count 36 for theft marginally exceeding R500,000, compared to the sentence for the remaining 82 counts totaling over R8 million. The court held that all counts should be considered together for sentencing purposes. The appellant's drug dependency, while a contributing factor, did not justify a significant reduction in sentence. The trial court failed to properly balance mitigating and aggravating factors, resulting in a sentence that was disturbingly inappropriate. Th…

  • Minimum Sentencing
  • White Collar Crime
  • Theft By Employee
  • Sentencing Discretion
  • Proportionality Of Sentence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2017] ZASCA 62

Broodryk v S (959/2016)

Broodryk v S (959/2016) [2017] ZASCA 62 (29 May 2017)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the trial court had properly considered all relevant factors, including the appellant's personal circumstances, the aggravating effect of her previous conviction, and the interests of society. The appellant committed theft while under a suspended sentence for a similar offence, demonstrating a lack of remorse and disregard for the deterrent effect of her prior conviction. The sentence of five years' imprisonment was not shockingly inappropriate, and the trial court was justified in discounting alternative sentencing options. The appeal against sentence wa…

  • Sentencing Discretion
  • Theft
  • Repeat Offender
  • White Collar Crime
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2016] ZAFSHC 114

Gebert v S (A271/2015)

Gebert v S (A271/2015) [2016] ZAFSHC 114 (30 June 2016)

The High Court upheld an appeal against sentence for fraud, finding the 8-year effective term too severe and reducing it to 4 years.

  • Fraud
  • Sentencing Discretion
  • Correctional Supervision
  • White Collar Crime
  • Constitutional Rights Of Children
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.