Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2025] ZAKZPHC 56

S v Zuma and Another (CCD30/2018)

S v Zuma and Another (CCD30/2018) [2025] ZAKZPHC 56 (3 June 2025)

The court held that it is not competent to order the State to stop the prosecution under section 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, as this discretion lies exclusively with the prosecuting authority. The relief sought by Thales and Mr Zuma was therefore not available. The court further found that the deaths of Messrs Maynot and Thétard, while unfortunate, did not amount to irreparable or insurmountable prejudice sufficient to justify stopping the prosecution or acquitting the accused. The alleged prejudice was speculative, and the availability and value of other witnesses could only be properly…

  • Withdrawal Of Prosecution
  • Fair Trial Rights
  • Irreparable Prejudice
  • Section 6 Criminal Procedure Act
  • Section 172 Constitution
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2017] ZAGPPHC 791

Freedom Under Law (RF) NPC v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others (89849/2015)

Freedom Under Law (RF) NPC v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others (89849/2015) [2017] ZAGPPHC 791; 2018 (1) SACR 436 (GP) (21 December 2017)

The Full Bench found that the decision to withdraw charges against Ms Jiba was irrational and unlawful, as it was based on a material error of law regarding section 78 of POCA, which does not afford immunity for intentional criminal conduct such as fraud and perjury. The NDPP and Regional Head failed to provide adequate and rational reasons for the withdrawal, and their after-the-fact explanations could not cure the defect. The President's failure to suspend and institute inquiries into the fitness of Jiba and Mrwebi to hold office in the NPA was irrational and unlawful, given the serious adv…

  • Legality Principle
  • Irrationality Review
  • National Prosecuting Authority Act
  • Suspension Of Public Officials
  • Withdrawal Of Prosecution
  • Separation Of Powers
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2014] ZASCA 58

National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others v Freedom Under Law (67/2014)

National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others v Freedom Under Law (67/2014) [2014] ZASCA 58; 2014 (4) SA 298 (SCA); 2014 (2) SACR 107 (SCA); [2014] 4 All SA 147 (SCA) (17 April 2014)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the decisions to withdraw criminal charges by the National Prosecuting Authority are reviewable on the principle of legality, not under PAJA, due to policy considerations and statutory exclusions. The withdrawal of charges was not merely provisional but final, and the failure to act in accordance with the empowering statute rendered the decision unlawful. The Commissioner of Police's termination of disciplinary proceedings and reinstatement of Mdluli constituted administrative action reviewable under PAJA, and the absence of reasons or evidence of indepen…

  • Principle Of Legality
  • Promotion Of Administrative Justice Act
  • Withdrawal Of Prosecution
  • Disciplinary Proceedings
  • Separation Of Powers
  • Locus Standi
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.