South Africa Case Law

Ngavu v S - Appeal (A88/2023)

Ngavu v S - Appeal (A88/2023) [2023] ZAFSHC 480 (9 November 2023)

Court

Free State High Court, Bloemfontein

Case number

A88/2023

Judges

Molitsoane, Zietsman

The appellate court found that the trial court over-emphasised the seriousness of the offences and the interests of society at the expense of the appellant's personal circumstances, particularly his youth and time spent in custody awaiting trial. The court held that the sentences imposed were disproportionate to the crimes committed, especially considering the nature and severity of the injuries sustained in the first assault. The appellant, though not a first offender, had no relevant previous convictions and was entitled to be treated as a first offender for sentencing purposes. The court a…

Source excerpt

• Assault With Intent To Do Grievous Bodily Harm
• Sentencing Discretion
• Mitigating Factors
• Youthfulness As Mitigation
• Gender Based Violence

Nkosi v S (A26/2022)

Nkosi v S (A26/2022) [2022] ZAGPPHC 563 (8 August 2022)

Court

North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria

Case number

A26/2022

Judges

Millar, Monyemangene

Appeal against sentence in a murder case upheld. The High Court found youthfulness and other personal circumstances justified departing from the minimum life sentence.

• Minimum Sentencing
• Substantial And Compelling Circumstances
• Youthfulness As Mitigation
• Guilty Plea
• Murder
• Criminal-law

Mthini v S (CA & R 16/19)

Mthini v S (CA & R 16/19) [2019] ZANCHC 34 (30 August 2019)

Court

Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley

Case number

CA & R 16/19

Judges

Phatshoane, Pakati

The High Court dismissed an appeal against life imprisonment for rape, holding that no substantial and compelling circumstances justified departure from the prescribed sentence.

• Rape
• Minimum Sentence Legislation
• Substantial And Compelling Circumstances
• Sentencing Discretion
• Rehabilitation
• Youthfulness As Mitigation

Olivier v S (A517/16)

Olivier v S (A517/16) [2018] ZAWCHC 78 (19 June 2018)

Court

Western Cape High Court, Cape Town

Case number

A517/16

Judges

Gamble, Sher

The High Court reduced a life sentence for gang rape to 22 years, finding the appellant’s youth and background were substantial and compelling circumstances.

• Rape Sentencing
• Minimum Sentencing Legislation
• Substantial And Compelling Circumstances
• Youthfulness As Mitigation
• Assault With Intent To Do Grievous Bodily Harm
• Rape-sentencing

Radebe v S (A497/2015)

Radebe v S (A497/2015) [2016] ZAGPPHC 690 (4 August 2016)

Court

North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria

Case number

A497/2015

Judges

Makhubele, E.M Kubushi

The trial court misdirected itself by failing to consider whether the appellant's youth and other personal circumstances constituted substantial and compelling circumstances justifying a departure from the prescribed minimum sentence of life imprisonment for rape. The presiding officer did not actively inquire into mitigating factors and placed undue emphasis on the fact that two persons committed the rape. The period spent in custody awaiting trial should have been considered as part of the overall assessment of an appropriate sentence. The appeal court found that the appellant's age and cir…

Source excerpt

• Rape
• Attempted Murder
• Minimum Sentencing Regime
• Substantial And Compelling Circumstances
• Youthfulness As Mitigation
• Period Spent In Custody

S v Nkosi (CC29/2013)

S v Nkosi (CC29/2013) [2016] ZAECPEHC 20 (30 March 2016)

Court

Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth

Case number

CC29/2013

Judge

P.W. Tshiki

Sentencing judgment in a murder conspiracy case. The court imposed life imprisonment on two accused, 18 years on a third, and a fine on a police officer accessory.

• Conspiracy To Commit Murder
• Minimum Sentencing
• Accessory After The Fact
• Youthfulness As Mitigation
• Murder-sentencing
• Conspiracy-to-commit-murder

Netshivhodza v S (962/2013)

Netshivhodza v S (962/2013) [2014] ZASCA 145 (26 September 2014)

Court

Supreme Court of Appeal

Case number

962/2013

Judges

Cachalia, Willis, Schoeman

The Supreme Court of Appeal found that the trial court misdirected itself by failing to consider whether substantial and compelling circumstances existed to justify a deviation from the prescribed minimum sentence of life imprisonment. The appellant was twenty years old at the time of the offence, had no previous convictions, suffered from asthma, and had spent seven months in custody before trial. The trial court did not properly investigate or record these factors, nor did it assess the proportionality of the sentence. The appellant's youthfulness, prospects of rehabilitation, and status as…

Source excerpt

• Rape
• Minimum Sentencing
• Substantial And Compelling Circumstances
• Youthfulness As Mitigation

Jojo v S (CA&R06/2014)

Jojo v S (CA&R06/2014) [2014] ZAECMHC 30 (28 August 2014)

Court

Eastern Cape High Court, Mthatha

Case number

CA&R06/2014

Judges

FBA Dawood, Dunwya

The High Court upheld an appeal against sentence for murder, reducing it from 15 years to 12 years after finding the trial court had misdirected itself.

• Minimum Sentence Legislation
• Sentencing Discretion
• Substantial And Compelling Circumstances
• Youthfulness As Mitigation
• Firearms Disqualification
• Criminal-sentencing

Nhlapo v S (A176/2012)

Nhlapo v S (A176/2012) [2013] ZAFSHC 57 (1 April 2013)

Court

Free State High Court, Bloemfontein

Case number

A176/2012

Judges

P W Da Rocha Boltney, M J Molemela

High Court appeal against sentence for rape succeeded, with the sentence reduced from 10 years to 7 years after the court found substantial and compelling circumstances.

• Rape
• Minimum Sentences
• Substantial And Compelling Circumstances
• Sentencing Guidelines
• Youthfulness As Mitigation
• Rape-sentencing

S v kganye (CAF 9/2010)

S v kganye (CAF 9/2010) [2013] ZANWHC 25 (7 March 2013)

Court

North West High Court, Mafikeng

Case number

CAF 9/2010

Judges

A A Landman, A M Kgoele, N Gutta

The High Court reduced a murder sentence from 25 to 18 years, finding the original sentence too severe and giving weight to youth, first-offender status, and custody served.

• Sentencing Principles
• Minimum Sentence Legislation
• Mitigating Factors
• Murder
• Youthfulness As Mitigation
• Criminal-sentencing