EXIM BANK T LTD VS MS HEDICO LTD COMM CASE NO

EXIM BANK T LTD VS MS HEDICO LTD COMM CASE NO

The preliminary objections fail because the execution sought is in accordance with the deed of settlement and its variation, the amount is ascertainable as per the variation, and there is no government party or interest requiring application of the Government Proceedings Act. The objections do not raise pure points of law and are therefore overruled with costs.

Citation
EXIM BANK T LTD VS MS HEDICO LTD COMM CASE NO
Parties
Decree Holder: EXIM BANK (TANZANIA) LIMITED; 1st Judgment Debtor: MS HEDICO LIMITED; 2nd Judgment Debtor: EPHRAIM SAMWEL MAGULLA; 3rd Judgment Debtor: HAPPY KAITIRA MAGULLA; 4th Judgment Debtor: ABDALLAH MZUNGU WANZALA
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2024
Procedural Posture
Commercial Execution / Ruling on Preliminary Objections in Execution Proceedings
Outcome
Preliminary objections overruled with costs.
Legal Topics
Execution of Decree, Preliminary Objection, Loan Recovery, Deed of Settlement, Government Proceedings Act
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

EXIM BANK (TANZANIA) LIMITED

Decree Holder

MS HEDICO LIMITED

1st Judgment Debtor

EPHRAIM SAMWEL MAGULLA

2nd Judgment Debtor

HAPPY KAITIRA MAGULLA

3rd Judgment Debtor

ABDALLAH MZUNGU WANZALA

4th Judgment Debtor

Procedural Posture

Commercial Execution / Ruling on Preliminary Objections in Execution Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the application for execution seeks to recover amounts contrary to the decree
  2. 2 Whether the application violates Section 6(2) and (5) of the Government Proceedings Act
  3. 3 Whether the decretal sum is sufficiently ascertained for execution

Ratio Decidendi

The preliminary objections fail because the execution sought is in accordance with the deed of settlement and its variation, the amount is ascertainable as per the variation, and there is no government party or interest requiring application of the Government Proceedings Act. The objections do not raise pure points of law and are therefore overruled with costs.

Court Disposition

Preliminary objections overruled with costs.

Orders

  • Preliminary objections dismissed.
  • Applicant awarded costs.