abb limited vs stella mandogo 2023 tzhcld 1420 27 september 2023

abb limited vs stella mandogo 2023 tzhcld 1420 27 september 2023

The applicant failed to provide good cause for the delay and did not account for each day of the delay; negligence or inaction of the applicant's advocate is not a sufficient ground for extension of time, and the applicant shares responsibility for the choice and actions of their advocate.

Citation
abb limited vs stella mandogo 2023 tzhcld 1420 27 september 2023
Parties
Applicant: ABB Limited; Respondent: Stella Mandogo
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
27 September 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application for Extension of Time / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Revision
Outcome
Application dismissed for want of merit.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision of Arbitration Award, Negligence of Advocate, Duty to Account for Delay
Source Language
English
Labour Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Revision of Arbitration Award Negligence of Advocate Duty to Account for Delay

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ABB Limited

Applicant

Stella Mandogo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application for Extension of Time / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Revision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for extension of time to file revision against the CMA ruling
  2. 2 Whether negligence or inaction of the applicant's advocate constitutes good cause for extension of time
  3. 3 Whether the applicant accounted for each day of delay

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide good cause for the delay and did not account for each day of the delay; negligence or inaction of the applicant's advocate is not a sufficient ground for extension of time, and the applicant shares responsibility for the choice and actions of their advocate.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed for want of merit.

Orders

  • Application for extension of time is dismissed.