Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

19830809 TZHC Mbeya2

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The appellants were found in possession of and sold stolen property, corroborated by witness testimony, justifying conviction and sentence.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • conviction and sentence affirmed

02

Material facts

Parties

Adamsdii Yisy

Appellant

Jijun Kal

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Value of Stolen Property: TZS 870
  • Sentence (years): 3

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The appellants denied selling the iron sheets in question to the witness and challenged the evidence against them.
Respondent
The prosecution relied on evidence of recovery of stolen property, identification of the property as belonging to the school, and corroboration by witnesses.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Penal Code s.296(1) and general principles of criminal evidence

    Conviction can be based on corroborated evidence of possession and sale of stolen property.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The appellants were found in possession of and sold stolen property, corroborated by witness testimony, justifying conviction and sentence.

Court disposition

appeal dismissed

  • conviction and sentence affirmed

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 9 August 1983

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 9 August 1983

19830809 TZHC Mbeya2

\v't•cL IN THE GII COURT 011' TANZANIA Am 1r•iyj J. Eij

FELT JIJEI ODI CTION (Mbeya Registry) RIiiINL }AAJ NO. 24 03? 1981 ORIGLiL CRThiINL C1SE NO. 100 OP 1979 OP THE DISTRICT COURT OF PUICtJYU DISTRICT AT TJKUYU Be±'ore: J. Taishokomia, District Liagi strata. (i) AD.LMSDII yisy) (2) JIi.JN K-Al ) .""

VERSUS THEBPU -I C .... . ......... . . . ............RhS:EON±)ENT aWGEs, Store Breking and 4tealing c/s.296(l) oI' the Fcnai. Code .J JJAiL J. The appellants we jointly cbr1od for starebreaking and stealing cernigated iron sheets property of Edeabela rirnary Sohool. It was in e4ence that during the night of 27/5'79 the store of the above SQQ.1. Was broken into and a total of 76 0.1. sheets vyere stolen. Investigatioi .ended in a search in the house of one 1n:1i1 1Vveboi. cFZ.2 from which 29Q.L- sheets were seized. Th sheets iee ilntifj1 as the sch1 pperty. On interrogation Laagolile said he had t the sheet from the twd who told him the sheets were theirs. These two appellants, were arrested. In their defence in court both of them &enied that they sold the sheets in question to ingo1ile (P.2). Their dafe.ee was rejeroted and they were convtcted and sentenced to 3 years imer.t a.h. They appealed to this court. There was evidence of Ewanansi (P.7.3) which ccrroboratd ingolile. I! (PL2) 1 s st ry that he had bought the C.I. Sheet fri the first appe11at \ , at the price of Shs.870/=. The second ape1lant as also there and it appears they had shared the boot. They were rightly convicted and thP. sentences. were in order. The 3oint appeal is dismissed j1, jk.s. enjjre.ty. At Mbeya, 9th Just 1 983 JUDGE.

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Penal Code s.296(1)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.