TULUSUBYA BUNINI KAMALAMO RULING
The flash disc was inadmissible because the prosecution failed to properly authenticate it and lay the necessary foundation for its admission, as the witness did not sufficiently identify the flash disc and its contents before tendering it as evidence.
- Citation
- TULUSUBYA BUNINI KAMALAMO RULING
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Republic; Accused: Tulusubya Bunini Kamalamo; Accused: James Thomas Bangu; Accused: Mohamed Hamadi Khais; Accused: Adballah Ally Mlwale; Accused: Deogratius Benedicto Lutataza; Accused: Judica Ngowo @Lightness S. Munisi @Lightness Samwel Munis; Accused: Febronia Nangwa; Accused: Glory John Eugen; Accused: Said Mohamed Bakari; Accused: Josephine Gadiel Sandewa; Accused: Doricas Gabriel Gwichala; Accused: Jesca Jonathan Lutagonzibwa; Accused: Alinanuswe Obel Mwasasumbe; Accused: Patrick Mazengo Chibwana; Accused: Ally Baruan Khalid James Nyakamande
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal (economic and Corruption) / Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence at Trial
- Outcome
- objection sustained in part; flash disc ruled inadmissible
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Electronic Evidence, Authentication of Exhibits, Bankers' Books, Committal Proceedings, Right to Fair Trial
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic
Prosecution
Tulusubya Bunini Kamalamo
Accused
James Thomas Bangu
Accused
Mohamed Hamadi Khais
Accused
Adballah Ally Mlwale
Accused
Deogratius Benedicto Lutataza
Accused
Judica Ngowo @Lightness S. Munisi @Lightness Samwel Munis
Accused
Febronia Nangwa
Accused
Glory John Eugen
Accused
Said Mohamed Bakari
Accused
Josephine Gadiel Sandewa
Accused
Doricas Gabriel Gwichala
Accused
Jesca Jonathan Lutagonzibwa
Accused
Alinanuswe Obel Mwasasumbe
Accused
Patrick Mazengo Chibwana
Accused
Ally Baruan Khalid James Nyakamande
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal (economic and Corruption) / Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence at Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the flash disc containing bank statements is admissible as evidence
- 2 Whether the accused were supplied with the flash disc as required by law
- 3 Whether proper foundation was laid for the admission of the flash disc and its contents
Ratio Decidendi
The flash disc was inadmissible because the prosecution failed to properly authenticate it and lay the necessary foundation for its admission, as the witness did not sufficiently identify the flash disc and its contents before tendering it as evidence.
Court Disposition
objection sustained in part; flash disc ruled inadmissible
Orders
- Flash disc presented by PW5 is inadmissible as evidence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment