Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZCA

19881218 TZCA Dar es Salaam

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The evidence did not establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies and questionable credibility of all parties involved; convictions cannot be sustained.

Court disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • convictions quashed
  • sentences set aside
  • appellants to be released unless otherwise lawfully detained
  • civil claims regarding cement to be pursued in civil court

02

Material facts

Parties

Anthony John

Appellant

John Bwire

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent Counsel: Mr. Bilago

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the convictions for giving false information, false swearing, and stealing goods in transit were established beyond reasonable doubt

Party arguments

Applicant
Appellants denied criminal liability, claimed cement was rightfully theirs, and challenged factual findings.
Respondent
Respondent supported conviction for Bwire but declined to support conviction for John.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Judicial precedent

    Appellate court may interfere with concurrent findings of fact only if lower courts overlooked material evidence.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The evidence did not establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies and questionable credibility of all parties involved; convictions cannot be sustained.

Obiter and limits

  • All parties may have acted dishonestly; civil claims regarding the cement should be pursued in civil court.

Court disposition

appeal allowed

  • convictions quashed
  • sentences set aside
  • appellants to be released unless otherwise lawfully detained
  • civil claims regarding cement to be pursued in civil court

Source and reliance status

TZCA · 18 December 1988

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZCA

Judgment· 18 December 1988

19881218 TZCA Dar es Salaam

~ '. 11 N D THE IlliTu".BLIC • • RI:.SFO!JDLNT \ ( Apoeal from the :•Jnvictions :,;1d s1:intences of the Hi,7,h Court of Tanzanin ·at Mwanza) ( rfoehi, J. ) Da-t~<l---tho 16th d:J.V of--&aJ?·::·o;nber 1 198] JU;)(ll(JLNT OF T ffi:. COURT This is a S,;Jconcl ::.ppeal by the t;.-10 ar,pull3nts 1 .!\NTHONY JOffif '.lnd JObil'H BWIRE, who W!r,:i convictod b;l Byabusha, sm.i, in the District Court of M·,nnM, in tho c:i~ J ')"" :::·:wire• for Giving fi1luo information, Falso Swonring and :::tnlin::; zood.s in transit, in the casa of the·a~ellant J1.1Jhn fo.r Sto,·.'.,.i:~.:· gooc1.s in transit,.; Bwire got n substai1tivo jail: term of fo~u- y·:,srs while tho ':lppellant John was givon throe yc,qrs. 0,: ,?.t>funl to the Eigh Court before M".lBhi, /• the· decision of th:.. tri::il was lE:ft f. intc1ct except th;:i convict, ion for Stcali:1,~ gc,ods in transit -I.----· was substituted for by ;:i conviction for Q°(J,,;aining gooc'.s by false I prot.oc.oee; The tri11l was a long stor-J but fo:i:- tb.e purposes of determining thU appeal it may be sum:.1arisod au follows:- .•... /2 • . .. · ' ;• ~: ;,.!~ ~:;,-..~-: ~ ~, ., . 2 P. ';{. l SAIDI YUSUF 1nd r. ',U2 were oper,:1ting as 'C':;irtners in the business of selling building ma~cricls at Musoma •. .Among the things they sold wcs cement. 1986 F. W, 12 went to the v-:- cement f.3ctory in Tan~e, t0 purchasei <lc!·,rn c.:rncnt. He

bought /' four hundred bags ar~_inst a rocipt, :2,'xlrihit 11, and left th.:i cement at a go down in Tang:,. own.:i d b,y .:in Indian. In August 1986 P. W. l wont to Tanga and con2i5nc,d them to Musoma in his. own nnm9, Sc1id Yusuf, Hr··,:_·,cr, he docl"lrcd only two hundred b':lgl:l 1 the idea boinc~ the:·: he, would pay fur 'the carriago of the othGr twe> hL'.n(roo. bags, plus penalty, at the othGr end. In October that yonr ·;10 wont to Mwanza port to enquire after his c,imont. Ho ;,,as tol cl that somcono else hqd offloaded and tc1ken ,'.:lway th,3 C(..m,,nt on production of som·3 documGnts. ·Encruirios trac•Jd tho cement to 3 store ownc,d by _P. W. ;3_ !,\MLS Hi;JDK::No. ?... 3.-3 con:'irm( d this in court but said the b,.gs he bought w0.rc only t'.::::::c hundr:-:d and eighty, ::it "'· ·1' shs. 45'::J/- pQr bag, and not four hunc'.r..:c:. o:· t,10 hundred.. 1·· ;'' Thora was Pros.Jcution evidonc-:i ·u;'.-- 1:1 number of witnesses, ,,i •I including P. W. 2 P.HNETO MUKi'.M;', and P, ;,i, Ll. F. C. U:'TICIA, and f .'! : P. ,,;. 6 Sgt. HAWA, to the offoct th'3t t:i..: :1pfcllant Bwire rod ! re-ported tho loss oi' l1in Rrdlwoys roc-:,ip·~ for com,~nt 1nd ·1 other documents. Ho went through the (rill oi' getting other ,1 .I .. docwnonts until cveintually ho was Jble 0 ~c cl.:ur the comcnt 'l,. . Ii:·· from Mwanz.'3 port. r. 1·i. 2 told the tri:;l coL;_rt that. P. \-/. l

L:ii;i:)r tlI!'nod up, with some d.ocu.ionts, S.':!yin,-; -·~:1.:.:-t h,, hP.d come to collect his cemont from Tanga. Ess enti~lly Bwirc c,id not deny hc,vin,~ taken the various .1 indeed his, h:iving bou.zht and consi,:;:,:;d. it in tho name of Sciicli Yus1.1.fu whose trading lic~ncc ho wcis :i.u:.115. The cement was • . . ..• /3 two hundr'cld b3.gs not !:our hundr,,d, Jnci. -~;'lat the · -wagon , usc,d could not possibl;r h,•.vo carri:i:l ,'.12 ;;1r::ny c1s four hundrod bags as its maximum c.c,pacity was 220 D::c's. Ea duly cloarcd. his cement, aftor ho had got o·~h.:r cioouments . \ br,isio'3lly as alleg:Jd1 as tho noc0ssar~r ,_;_ocwr,0nte had got lost when ill, w:is st'.1ying at an hot-al in··., :;;rn. He did sell -t-h.e. cpm-,nt, two hundred. bags to t. i-I, 3. 'rhcr:.: 1•1ae no ship to carry the oom0nt from Mwanza to Musoma so he l1i:c, to offload it in Mwanza. In ~a defonoo the appellant J0hn c1.icl not deny hcilping J3wiro to cl,pr tho oom,:,nt nnd facili·:·:.tine: its sal\'.I to r. W. 3, He rui.d been ~pproaohod u,y :1 mnn C'Jllorl lb1'.1,ua (whl) w~a • · (..._ co-charged with them but got acquitt.:id) ;;:id Bwire. 'j ·· j l !1s aforos~id, tho appellants' app:,.:-:ls to the High Court were unsucc~esful, Moshi, J. boin,-:; satisfied that tho issues were f:::ictual and tr"' ro was no t:o()r.1_ rc,aeon for him to interfere. J3efore us the ar,pollants conduc·;:;t ti"!,,ir

ar,p~als i. I ' rersonally. Mr. Bila:c0 '-lfponn,d on bch,.:::.:::· of tho r'.'Spcndent l .. I ~ '1 ; and-· -~-declined to surport John's conviction. He howevor sui'ported the conviction in reEpcct o:i '~lw 2.prcllant Bwirc. Ordin::irily cf course this court ,1ould not intt.rfl'lrc with the concurront findings of f:,ct of a trial court ':!nd th1,1 ijigh Court. ,Tho few oxcoptional r;i·tur..tiona in which wo can intorforo inclu,ie ;,.netE1ncos in uh:Lch th( courts bo1ow ·;..r, ··: ·'l appear to havo ovorlcokoc to t::-:ko into ::wcr,unt certain aepacts ~l · of the evidence which in oi;r view woulc: h"IVO led to different 'i .J conclusions had those portiot1s of the cvicl;;;ncEJ being considor<:·d "lnd analysed. W,~. arc rcspcctfu.lly of ~h,.. view that this is one such case. J3wiro haz given hie EirJ.::: of the• story, th3.t tha . .I . '. ·~- ·~-~:~i . ·,._1 ,. ' .:-,I 4 - ·:: cement wae really his. We ·,;arn ou1•.a:1J.·.::::: "..h;,t h(;)ro, on oith:3r side, we aro (1.u1;.1ling with indivj.,_:1.,nl1;J who moy not be all th.'3t etr:;iight for,-mrd and truthful. Wc, have r. W. l and P. WJ.2, · tho compbinante who, Wh'3tGV.\::' thdr ~xplanation, were, going to ch-:rnt Railways of thJi:!.' i-::·.:Utc'S by d,,·claring fowar bags than thoy say they :,ictu~lly con:-1ign;,d. Indeed evc-n wh.Gn '.F. W. 1 pres-:intcd his ptipors ...:-':. -~;-..c rort he said he h13d come to clesr hio two

hli.ndre1 b::;:;s. Only whon ho w::1s told that the oomont h.:1d been collectoC:. b:,· somebody olSEi did he disclose that it was in f<1ct four hun<.lr·.:,d. bags. r. W. l .lnd r. W.12 are the samo shady charactGre ,1~10 rushe;cl to obtain Exhibit r.16 1 an extr~1ct from the Rcgio·~::.-~1· of Business •Names to prop up thvir clai:11 that thoy w-:ire op~r'.".tine; as a partnorship. But thon the dato of rc.gietration was l"it\ Octob<:r 1 1986 1 a day afto:r tho 31:-pcllants h11d boon ·h~k.:i,1 to court, But <ilVon moro, thJ witness Ch::rngwo, oM of thu po.rtno:s, cnteg,::,rically told th., court of trial thd he h':ld left th..) coniunt in Tanga. The .,I Railway~ consignment note however contr.:::c1icts him 1.nd appears 1. r, to support J3wiro's contention. l.ccord.i::.:; to th_-, noto, the cement was oonsigna:i from rongwo 1 of which wo tako judicial notice th?_t_j._i is tho r::1.ilway station ncui•.;st to th(: comont facto~ 1:1nd not from, Tonga which is f:-:rth.::.r away fTom Mw:rnza. ',-ley should P. W. l t'lkv the troublu ,ncl i:1cur th(' unnocc-sa~u-y k. oxpen.110 of t,;iking b.'1ck thE cement from -~;,.c etorc in Tanga, i. f . to r-ongl(e 1 presuma.bly by r0c1d, so .-i.s -to consign it to Musoma? ! I I J3wire sa:,~ he consigr.od the cemflnt fro111 _:.:_onvwe, and th,.,t thoy · :tend to sun,riort him. ,. ' ... ,. .. · ; .. . ...... .... • . . L.. 7F r: ... ; .•,

..i,......,.. .:/r.(-~\ .' . -..... ~. .1- : \ 1;_,; _..,..,..,._. ·~~-'!-- 5 :/J"·Jt( :·.J!4:.-,·.-: ~f~ ·.. ~' ~1_:,, I:t is conceiv'lble that F.H.1 1 P.l·i.12 -~nd Bwire wcro all crooks .in the 'lffair and that eucl-; 1·12s trying to r,ull I -a fast one on the othor. This was -~ crir,1inal trial 1:1nd in -.;,. -~· viow of what we hav;;i s.:-,id, w0 aro unablo tc, sustain th(;! -~~:·· 'J ~.--' finding that tho ap!)Oll3nts 1 guilt h;id b.:..:in established beyond .} .. ;? ; roasonablo dou.bt. WCJ allow those a-pru3l:.:: 1 riuosh thQ nqnviotiona ...... r ;.· . ~- and sot aside th<1 sentences.. If tho ar,i,c:..lants ::ire not otherwise in lawful custody they should be f:<;;t :fro() for-thwi-t.h. Who~)vor has cl::,ims on the ccmant er on the 01.onioa .-tho eu.bject matter of tho trial court ord.ci s, anc:. tho claims 0 aro resisted by aey pore on among P. W. 1~ P. il.12, !. lcl. 3 and Bwiro, h~ should seek to recover th~ sam<1 by wa,'.' of civil acti~ D.\TI!;D at M'.f!.NZi", this llt,h dny of Docombor, 1988. F. L. :1:f.\11.LI 9HIEF JUST I CE. L. l>I. lii.Ki.till!: ....."' JUST IC:.:: CI' Atr. EH · ...._ t.. --- ~- -.\. l,1. ,.. 011 ;1. R JUGTI CE Ct' MtLl~L td--- ;;I) •·':' ......-.., _.,._ ,,-,t: •'flt: . ( J, If. EJOFFL) 81:NIOR :··:m:::cyy RlGISTRJ\R ,·. . •. . . ?- • ~- - . ; '--:.~tt .... - .· .. . ,t . . ,i ,· ~ • ~":}J1 it,, J,r

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.