Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

athanasi madenga and another vs republic 2019 tzhc 2168 23 october 2019

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The applicants' sentences were reduced due to their status as refugees, inability to pay fines, and the fact that they were brought to the game reserve by Tanzanians for work, making immediate release just and equitable.

Court disposition

sentence reduced; immediate release ordered

Orders

  • Applicants to be released from prison forthwith unless held for other lawful cause.
  • Applicants to be handed over to Nduta Refugees Camp management for handling according to refugee status.

02

Material facts

Parties

Athanasi s/o Madenga

Applicant

Ndimishiye s/o Richard

Applicant

Republic

Respondent Counsel: Antia Julius

Amounts and remedies

  • Fine Imposed on 1st Applicant: TZS 150,000
  • Fine Imposed on 2nd Applicant: TZS 100,000
  • Imprisonment Term: 12
  • Age of 2nd Applicant: 63

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Revision / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

whether the applicants' sentences should be reduced given their circumstances as refugees and inability to pay fines

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicants claimed they were taken to work by Tanzanians and only discovered the area was a game reserve after arrest; requested forgiveness to rejoin families at refugee camp.
Respondent
State attorney argued there were no justifiable reasons for the court to interfere with the trial court's findings.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Wildlife Conservation Act No. 5 of 2009

    Sentences should be proportionate and consider individual circumstances, including inability to pay fines and refugee status.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The applicants' sentences were reduced due to their status as refugees, inability to pay fines, and the fact that they were brought to the game reserve by Tanzanians for work, making immediate release just and equitable.

Obiter and limits

  • Applicants were left in custody while Tanzanians paid fines and left.
  • Second applicant is aged and has dependents at the refugee camp.

Court disposition

sentence reduced; immediate release ordered

  • Applicants to be released from prison forthwith unless held for other lawful cause.
  • Applicants to be handed over to Nduta Refugees Camp management for handling according to refugee status.

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 23 October 2019

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 23 October 2019

athanasi madenga and another vs republic 2019 tzhc 2168 23 october 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (Kigoma District Registry)

AT KIGOMA CRIMINAL REVISION 19 OF 2019 (Originating from Criminal Case No. 243/2019 of the District Court of Kibondo at Kibondo Before F. Y. Mbeiwa-RM) ATHANASI S/O MADENGA..................... 1ST APPLICANT NDIMISHIYE S/O RICHARD.................. 2ND APPLICANT

VERSUS REPUBLIC...................................................... RESPONDENT

JUDGMENT 23/10/2019 & 23/10/2019 MATUMA, J. The applicants Athanasi Madenga and Ndaimishiye Richard were charged in the District Court of Kibondo along with two others namely Kisahela s/o Ngobongo and Andrea s/o Lucas for an offence of unlawful entry in the game reserve contrary to section 15 (1) and (2) of the Wildlife Conservation Act No. 5 of 2009. They were all convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Tshs 150,000/= or imprisonment term of 12 months. Ndaimishiye 1 Richard was on his party sentenced to pay a fine of Tshs 100,000/= or to serve a custodial sentence of 12 months. The two applicants are foreign nationals and refugees at Nduta Refugees Camp. They are complaining that they were taken to work for the Tanzanians at the place where they later discovered to be a game reserve after their arrest. They prays to be forgiven so that they can join their families at the camp. The learned state attorney Antia Julius was of the view that this application be rejected as no justifiable reasons for this court to interfere with the findings of the trial court. I have taken the circumstances of this case with a great concern. These applicants were taken to the game reserve by the Tanzanians to work for them. But on their arrest and conviction the Tanzanians paid the fine and left behind these innocent poor people starving into custody for they could not afford to pay

the fine. Furthermore, the second applicant Ndaimishiye Richard at the time of his arrest on 6/9/2019 was aged 63 years old. He is too aged. Despite of his old age he still fights for life of himself and his family whom he has stated to be a wife androur children. 2 The first applicant Athanasi Madenga has also left his two children in the camp. I find it in the interest of justice that the sentence of the applicants be reduced to meet the circumstances. I therefore reduce the sentence of both applicants to that which would lead to their immediate release from custody. It is thus, ordered that the applicants be released from prison forthwith unless otherwise held for some other lawful cause. Since they are refugees, I direct that they be handled over to the management of Nduta Refugees Camp to be dealt in accordance of their refugees status. It is so ordered. 23/10/2019 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Wildlife Conservation Act No. 5 of 2009

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.