athumanikungubaya 428 others vs tanzania telecommunication company litd 2022 tzhcld 927 14 september 2022

athumanikungubaya 428 others vs tanzania telecommunication company litd 2022 tzhcld 927 14 september 2022

The court held that leave to file a representative suit can be sought at any time, and only the intended suit is subject to time limitation. Therefore, the application for extension of time was granted.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
athumanikungubaya 428 others vs tanzania telecommunication company litd 2022 tzhcld 927 14 september 2022
Parties
Applicant: Athumani Kungubaya & 428 Others; Respondent: Tanzania Telecommunication Company Ltd
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
14 September 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Leave for Representative Suit
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Representative Suit, Labour Court Procedure
Source Language
en
Labour Law Extension of Time Representative Suit Labour Court Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Athumani Kungubaya & 428 Others

Applicant

Tanzania Telecommunication Company Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Leave for Representative Suit

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to extension of time to file leave to lodge a representative suit

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that leave to file a representative suit can be sought at any time, and only the intended suit is subject to time limitation. Therefore, the application for extension of time was granted.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Leave to file a representative suit to be lodged within twenty one days from the date of the ruling