Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

athumanikungubaya 428 others vs tanzania telecommunication company litd 2022 tzhcld 927 14 september 2022

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court held that leave to file a representative suit can be sought at any time, and only the intended suit is subject to time limitation. Therefore, the application for extension of time was granted.

Court disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Leave to file a representative suit to be lodged within twenty one days from the date of the ruling

02

Material facts

Parties

Athumani Kungubaya & 428 Others

Applicant Counsel: Ms. Magreth Maggebo

Tanzania Telecommunication Company Ltd

Respondent Counsel: Mr. Emmanuel Mkonyi

Amounts and remedies

  • Number of Applicants: 429
  • Time Allowed to File Leave (days): 21

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Leave for Representative Suit

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicants are entitled to extension of time to file leave to lodge a representative suit

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicants sought extension of time to file leave to lodge a representative suit, arguing that such leave can be sought at any time.
Respondent
Respondent opposed the application through a counter affidavit.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Court's interpretation of procedural law

    A person may at any time seek leave to file a representative suit; time limitation applies to the intended suit/application/petition, not the leave itself.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court held that leave to file a representative suit can be sought at any time, and only the intended suit is subject to time limitation. Therefore, the application for extension of time was granted.

Court disposition

Application granted

  • Leave to file a representative suit to be lodged within twenty one days from the date of the ruling

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 14 September 2022

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 14 September 2022

athumanikungubaya 428 others vs tanzania telecommunication company litd 2022 tzhcld 927 14 september 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

LABOUR DIVISION

AT PAR ES SALAAM MISC. APPLICATION NO. 178 OF 2022 (Emanating from Revision No. 150 of 2019 before Hon. S.A.N. Wambura, J.)

BETWEEN ATHUMANIKUNGUBAYA& 428 OTHERS ................................ APPLICANTS

VERSUS TANZANIA TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LITD................. RESPONDENT

RULING S.M. MAGHIMBL J: The application beforehand was made under Section 94(l)(b) of the Employment and Labour Relations Act, Cap. 366 R.E 2019 ("The ELRA") and Rule 24(l),(2)(a),(b),(c),(d),(e) and (f) and (3) (a),(b),(c),(d) and Rule 56(1) of the Labour Court Rules G.N. No. 106 of 2007("the Rules"). In the Chamber Summons as well as the notice of application, the applicant is applying to the Honorable Court for orders in the following terms; 1. That the Honorable Court be pleased to grant an Extension of time to file leave to the Applicants to lodge a representative suit, 2. Costs of the Application be provided for an i 3. Any other relief(s) that this Honorable Court may deem fit and just to grant. On her part, the respondent opposed the application by filing a counter affidavit. The application was disposed by way of written submissions. The applicants submissions were drawn and filed by Ms. Magreth Maggebo, learned advocate while the respondent's submissions were drawn and filed by Mr. Emmanuel Mkonyi, learned State Attorney. On my part, having considered the substance of the application, I need not be detained much by this application. I am even impressed by the fact that the applicant has sought extension of time to file leave to file representative suit. A person may at any time seek leave to file representative suit, what will be subject to time limitation shall be the intended suit/application/petition as the case may be. Owing to that, I proceed to grant this application. The leave to file a representative suit shall be lodged in this court within twenty one days of the date of this ruling. Dated at Dar es Salaam this 14th day of September, 2022.

JUDGE 2

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Section 94(1)(b) of the Employment and Labour Relations Act, Cap. 366 R.E 2019

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Rule 24(1),(2)(a)-(f),(3)(a)-(d) and Rule 56(1) of the Labour Court Rules G.N. No. 106 of 2007

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.