19850925 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Citation
- 19850925 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 25 September 1985
- Posture
- Criminal / Trial and Sentencing
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 25 September 1985
- Posture
- Criminal / Trial and Sentencing
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The accused was convicted on his own admission of guilt to three counts of attempted murder committed during a robbery, and sentenced to twenty-five years imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently with each other and with the existing seven-year robbery sentence, due to the deliberate and serious nature of the offences and the use of a lethal weapon.
Court disposition
conviction and sentencing
Orders
- Accused convicted on three counts of attempted murder.
- Sentenced to twenty-five years imprisonment on each count, sentences to run concurrently with each other and with the seven-year robbery sentence.
- Accused ordered to pay compensation of Shs. 3,000/= to each victim.
- Right of appeal against sentence explained.
02
Material facts
Parties
The United Republic
Prosecution Counsel: Kyaruzi/KambaShiba Jofi
Accused Counsel: Mr. KisakaAmounts and remedies
- Imprisonment Per Count: years 25
- Compensation Per Victim: Shs. 3,000
- Existing Robbery Sentence: years 7
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Trial and Sentencing
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the accused committed attempted murder under Section 211 of the Penal Code
- 02
Whether sentences should run concurrently with previous robbery conviction
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The accused admitted the charges and facts, pleaded guilty to three counts of attempted murder, and requested consideration of his family circumstances and prior custody.
- Respondent
- Prosecution presented facts of attempted murder during a robbery, tendered medical evidence, and argued for severe sentence due to prevalence and seriousness of the offences.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Judicial discretion and sentencing practice
Concurrent sentencing for offences committed in the course of a single transaction
- 02
Sentencing guidelines
Consideration of mitigating factors such as guilty plea, age, and dependants
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The accused was convicted on his own admission of guilt to three counts of attempted murder committed during a robbery, and sentenced to twenty-five years imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently with each other and with the existing seven-year robbery sentence, due to the deliberate and serious nature of the offences and the use of a lethal weapon.
Obiter and limits
- Such offences are prevalent in Dar es Salaam City and warrant severe sentences.
- The accused's plea of guilty, age, and dependants were considered in mitigation.
Court disposition
conviction and sentencing
- Accused convicted on three counts of attempted murder.
- Sentenced to twenty-five years imprisonment on each count, sentences to run concurrently with each other and with the seven-year robbery sentence.
- Accused ordered to pay compensation of Shs. 3,000/= to each victim.
- Right of appeal against sentence explained.
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 25 September 1985
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 25 September 1985
\ DT :I.1I-ill IITGH COlTilT o:,:, '.!: . Y"?,i,?IA OP..IGDTLL JURISDIC'l1ION' (Dar es Salann Il.egist:iy) CRIJWII~AL SESSION'S Ci:3:C NO. 16 OP 1981 The United Republic versus
SHIBA JOFI PROCEJ~DIKG;J 25/9/85 Coram: Baba.ti, J. For Republic - Kyaruzi/Kamba For Accused.: Er. Kisr:.)l:a, ,:·: : \' .. ,. Accused: lTesent. \); . ; :; , . Hr-► Kyaruzi :- Counsel who was to prosecute this case has alre8:dy see~ M,1:.,:4'-;~ '': I your Jl.ordship to tell you that he is indisposed.· His \' \~\ . 118.me is I.ii:'. \fere~a. lTo:-i.·oovo1· I do not see any witnesses\' \ ·, in this case. P~guest adjournnent. r:: '\..'. - prder: - Hearing adjoun1ec1 to another data to be fixed by Registrar. l.,. \~.,.~-;.,. A.1·,/ Sgd. JU::Xrn \;t•·. . .' \jf.·.i f1' . _ . 25/9/85 iI•: '. . ., ~: '.i'here is no need to waste time~ I do admit the charge and I am waiting foi~ sentence only. Mr. Kisaka: - I did not get such instructions :from the accused and in any case I would not advise him to do so. Prop..!_ - I would be ready to give the facts after an hour or so • .9£§2]'...:.. - Plea to be taken after o.n llm.lr to allow the Prosecution time to prepa1--e the facts. Sgd. .;; • Tu.ha ti
JUDGE 25/9/85 11.20 a.m. Court as before Appearances as before- Accused: present. l'!r, Kyaruzi: ::·.;:.: .:...I am applyi!lg to substitute a fresh information: with t'.hree ·coiui~s/· Mr. Kisal.c:a: .No objection.· Court: - ·Accused di scharg8d of pr8Vi ous inf ormati Ono Fresh inf ormatiO.r1 .read o~er and ex?lained to accusdd who states:- !st Count:- It is true ind. count:- It is true Jrd. Count: - It is true Entered as a plea of guilty to the three counts. Prosecution: - Facts . The accused Simba Toti 1s charged with three counts of attempted murder contrary to Section 211 of the Penal Coie. On 7th June, 1979, a9eused while along Jamhuri Street in Dar ea S.alaam attempted to kill three people who are C. P. L. Mlcpmwa and Chanda Mohamed and Peter Vioe.nt. Corporal Mkomwa was shot at by the accused using a pistol whiie trying to arrest accused lawfuily. This corporal got a dangerous wound at the stomach, Also other people who were trying to assist Corporal M1comwa were shot at by accused who then suffered serious wounds. Chande Mohamed was wounded at his stomach and the third it1jured person was Peter Vice.n-t· who was wounded at his right leg, Eventually the aooused was overpcHered and arrested. I wish to tender the PF.3 in respect of the three injured person.a. I iende1' PF.3 i.n respect~of Corp. Mkomwa (admitted as e:,:hibit P.I). I alEIO tender PF. 3 of Chande Mohamed as exhibit (admitted as e:ich. Po2) I also tender PF.3 of Peter Vinoent as exhibit (admitted as exh. P$3). I will read what the fl exhibits have on thenir. (Reads through e.xhibi~~)- Th-<l·t is all. ~ooueea~- ~he facts are oorreot. Co1rt:- El On hie own admisslon of the offence and facts I convict accused of the offences as ohargedo Sgd. A. Bahati
JUDGE I ~ '3/ 25/9/1985 Pro~:{-· The accused wr.s cu~-victe<"I. .i.n ~ i n Kisutu Criminal Case No.1331/79., · · · .... /3 ---- 3 Court: Thnt is not. previous conviction. There is no record. H:iti&1tion: · T.he accused went to a shop of some /\Siem and committed robbery• Then he esc~ped. Then as the Police was arresting the accused, accused sho-c these people. The accused v~s . convicted of robbery in the District Court and was sentenced to 7 yenrs. .But these offences were in _the course of the robbery offence. The :.:fc -:i.rned is mnr:ded with one child. His parents are old and do depend on hirn. I t,sk that the accused' :fate be considered along those lines. Allocutus:- Nil Sentence: ltccused is F.I first off(:mder, He hc.s buen in custody since 9/6/79 r- when he w.:-1s nrrested. ·-1e is at the moment serving a 7 year sentence for robhery which wn.s committed in the courr,e of the commission of these othGr offences. I agree w:i.. th the defence counsel that the sentences in this cnse should nm concurrently w:i. th the sentence in the robbs:ry case. I gan see hardly anything in f::wour of the accused here as this was.: ::\eliberate coJ1rdnsion of an of/once which could have cost three lives. These types of ofienpes nre quite prevalent in !or es Salaam City and as such a severe sentence is called for. I however take into consideration the accused's plea of guilty and [.,lso
his age and his dependants. But in view of the seriousness of these of:i:ences which were committed by t:Ie use o:f n lethal weapon namely a pistol I sentence o.ccusoa as fol\ows:-- J.at CAllnt:- Imprisonment for t·-,venty five years. 2nd Count:- Imp:i;-iso:nment for twenty five yeo.:r;s. .2!d Count:- Imprisorim.ent for twenty five yea.rs. These sentences arc to run concurrently with one another and they o.re also to run concurrently vii tll tiw sen-;:ence o:c seven ye3.rs for rob):)e:ry whiah sentence tl1e :,c .::..umJ. is no',7 servir:ig. I also order accused to pay compcnso.tion to each o.::' ~1is victi1,1s in the sum of Shs. 3,000/= for each vj_ctim. Right of appeal against sentence to the court of Appeal explained. .. ---~-- ~-~~~~:_):' .. -------~~~r - ·. \--· - ---- . ,.··· .... · JUDGE ·\ I . '
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.